CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 1 juin 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-225683
- Date
- 1 juin 2023
- Publication
- 1 juin 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sE5FF4F24 { height:71pt } .s80190776 { height:57.4pt } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } Published on 26 June 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no.   16047/21 Sergey Nikolayevich SKOROKHODOV against Russia and 19 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 1 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     16047/21 05/03/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich SKOROKHODOV 1991 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow 03/08/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 24/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 03/08/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     16347/21* 09/03/2021 Aleksandr Gegamovich MURADYAN 1976 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally against the amendments to the Constitution   Moscow 15/07/2020 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 10/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 15/07/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based     16588/21* 02/03/2021 Sergey Vladimirovich ERSHOV 1978 Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov Podolsk Opposition rally   Moscow 22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 16/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 22/06/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (such record drawn up on 15/07/2020)   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     16783/21* 02/03/2021 Igor Nikolayevich AFANASYEV 1968 Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov Podolsk Opposition rally   Moscow 22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 16/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 22/06/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (such record drawn up on 16/07/2020)   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     17041/21 10/03/2021 Nikolay Vladimirovich KOMAROV 1987 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally against amendments to the Constitution and COVID-19 restrictions   Samara 21/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Samara Regional Court 10/09/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     17144/21* 15/03/2021 Emil Rolanovich YUNUSOV 2000 Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh Moscow A stroll in support of Ilya Azar   Moscow 05/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 16/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 08/06/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record in respect of the events of 05/06/2020   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based     17336/21 09/03/2021 Natalya Anatolyevna TRUBINA 1984 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally in support of Khabarovsk protests   Krasnoyarsk 08/08/2020 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 10/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention between 08/08/2020 and 09/08/2020 as administrative suspect, and after the record of an administrative offence had been drawn up on 08/08/2020   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     19425/21* 15/03/2021 Roman Grigiryevich KARTSEV 2002 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative arrest of 5 days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     19516/21* 17/03/2021 Valentina Aleksandrovna VAKULENKO 1957 Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov Podolsk Opposition rally   Moscow 22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 16/12/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 22/06/2020 in excess of three hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (such record drawn up on 20/07/2020 only)   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   19635/21* 23/03/2021 Yelena Nikolayevna SAMBORSKAYA 1974 Mikhail Igorevich Tunikov Vladivostok Rally in support of S. Furgal   Vladivostok 01/08/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Primorye Regional Court 05/10/2020     20145/21* 23/03/2021 Yegor Alekseyevich POROKHOVOY 2001   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Alexey Navalnyy   Volgograd 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Volgograd Regional Court 03/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   20384/21* 21/03/2021 Ilnur Diazettinovich BAYGAZIN 1994 Aydar Azatovich Mullanurov Ufa Rally for protection of Kushtau mountain   Bashkortostan Republic 15/08/2020 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 600 Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic 21/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - unlawful detention on 15/08/2020 for more than 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   21177/21* 31/03/2021 Nikita Pavlovich GOLOVIZIN 2001 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Voronezh 23/01/2021       article 20.2 § 2 of CAO; article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative detention of 5   days and fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court (two decisions) on 12/02/2021 and 26/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station on 26/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of the administrative-offence proceedings   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s convictions were based   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under Art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO for making calls to participate in an unauthorised rally of 23/01/2021 using his Vkontakte account ( Elvira Dmitriyeva v.Russia , nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019)   22175/21 07/04/2021 Nadezhda Ivanovna KUZNETSOVA 1958     Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Volgograd 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Volgograd Regional Court 10/03/2021     22224/21 02/04/2021 Sergey Andreyevich POKATILOV 2021 Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Irkutsk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention of 10   days Irkutsk Regional Court 28/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   22251/21* 08/04/2021 Talgat Albertovich AKHMADIYEV 1992     Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Kazan 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 24/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to a police station, detention between 23/01/2021 and 25/01/2021 as administrative suspect   22597/21* 02/04/2021 Timur Robertovich SLAYEV 2000 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Saransk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of Mordovia 03/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention between 23/01/2021 and 24/01/2021 as administrative suspect, after the offence record had been compiled on 23/01/2021; arrest recorded about 10 hours after the actual apprehension;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   23082/21* 27/04/2021 Andrey Aleksandrovich ALEKSANDROV 1989 Aleksandr Vladimirovich Molokhov Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO administrative detention for 5   days Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 23/01/2023 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (such record drawn up on 28/01/2021),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the conviction was based and to submit video recordings in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution   31688/21 12/05/2021 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich KRYLOV 1961 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg Rally is support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 13   days St Petersburg City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (see Tsvetkova and Others v.   Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 179-191, 10   April 2018)   32555/21* 15/06/2021 Daniil Sergeyevich MASALKIN 2002 Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova Moscow Commemorating the anniversary of the revolution   Perm 07/11/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO community works of 20   hours Perm Regional Court 29/01/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 07/11/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; failure to draw up an arrest record   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in court the police officers who had arrested the applicant  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 1 juin 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-225683
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel