CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 juin 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-225801
- Date
- 14 juin 2023
- Publication
- 14 juin 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s4F306575 { height:38.45pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sB5572423 { height:135.2pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 3 July 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no. 29017/18 Vincenzo GIUDICE and Others against Greece lodged on 14 June 2018 communicated on 14 June 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicants’ lack of access to a court, following the dismissal of their civil action against two companies because they could not afford to pay a sum corresponding to the companies’ legal costs and expenses prior to adjudication of the case (« εγγυοδοσία »). The first applicant is owner, captain and mechanic of a fishing ship named “LUISA” and the second and third applicants are members of its crew. Their ship was implicated in an accident with another ship named “CMA VGM ELBE” which resulted in the former’s sinking. The applicants brought civil proceedings against the company which had ownership of the second ship (“LACEY NAVIGATION Inc”), the company which represented it in Greece (“DANAOS SHIPPING”), the officer on duty D.Z. and its captain C.T. Following the two companies’ request, the first-instance court suspended the proceedings against them and ordered the applicants to deposit as security: 23,150 euros (EUR) - the first applicant, EUR 3,150 - the second applicant, and EUR   3,000 - the third applicant - to the Loans and Funds Deposit, pursuant to Article 169 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In particular, it was considered that in the event the applicants lost their civil action, the two companies would not be able to enforce the decision granting them legal costs and expenses and, therefore, the applicants should deposit in advance the above-mentioned sums. Due to the inability of the applicants to pay the security within the deadline, their action was dismissed against the two companies and continued in respect of the two individuals. The proceedings ended in the applicants’ favour. They were awarded EUR 329,190.50 but could not enforce the judgment due to lack of assets of the two individuals. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants exhausted the domestic remedies? In particular, have they put forward their arguments about lack of access to a court before the Court of Cassation in accordance with the domestic procedural rules?   2.     Have the applicants been deprived of their right of access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention due to the dismissal of their civil action against the two companies because they were unable to deposit in advance a sum corresponding to the eventual legal costs and expenses the two companies would be entitled to recover in the event the applicants lost their civil action against them?   APPENDIX   List of applicants   No. Applicant’s name Year of birth Place of residence Nationality Representative’s name Location 1.         2.         3. Vincenzo GIUDICE 1955 Augusta Italian Giuseppe ZUPPELLA 1971 Catane Italian Carmelo EVOLI 1958 Augusta Italian Dimitrios PETROUSKAS Samos  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 14 juin 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-225801
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel