CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 29 juin 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-226121
- Date
- 29 juin 2023
- Publication
- 29 juin 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5DA764EC { height:79.6pt } Published on 24 July 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   2825/21 Damir Islamovich STALIN against Russia and 35 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 29 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     2825/21* 05/12/2020 Damir Islamovich STALIN 1970 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg Political rally   Samara, 21/06/2020     Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Samara, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 5 days of detention (quashed on appeal)         15 hours of community work Samara Regional Court 30/06/2020         Samara Regional Court 15/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (i) delay in releasing the applicant: after the appeal decision of 30/06/2020, quashing the sentence to 5-day detention, he was released only on 01/07/2020; (ii) on 05/02/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings in 2021,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in the 2021 case,   Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events – the refusal to approve the rally on 21/06/2020 on account of the regional COVID-related ban on public events (final decision: Supreme Court of Russia, 12/02/2021),   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect, in the proceedings in 2020     19051/21 20/03/2021 Irina Aleksandrovna KORPUSEVA 1988 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg Rally to support S.   Furgal   Blagoveschensk, 18/07/2020 article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Amur Regional Court 28/09/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - the applicant was finally acquitted of participation in the non-approved rally on 18/07/2020 (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO; Amur Regional Court, 09/09/2020) and was then convicted of participation in the same rally considered unlawful because of the COVID-related ban on public events (Art. 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO)     20302/21 14/03/2021 Denis Vasilyevich GRUBENKO 1989 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally to support S.   Furgal   Krasnoyarsk, 01/08/2020     Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Krasnoyarsk, 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000             3 days of detention Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 24/09/2020         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 17/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 21/04/2021 and 23-24/04/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in 2021,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention in the proceedings in 2021; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect     21107/21* 05/04/2021 Vladimir Ivanovich CHERNYSHEV 1966 Yevgeniy Vladislavovich Sokolov Belgorod Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Belgorod, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 22/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     29390/21* 11/05/2021 Vitaliy Mikhaylovich GUREYEV 2002 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 12 days of detention Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant     29391/21* 11/05/2021 Nikita Aleksandrovich BUDKIN 1990 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 30/01/2021-01/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant     29604/21* 11/05/2021 Anna Arkadyevna KHORT 2002 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO 15 days of detention Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial reports or statements were used for convicting the applicant     31685/21* 07/06/2021 Anna Gennadyevna SHCHEBET 1980   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Bryansk, 31/01/2021     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO   and   article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000     and   fine of RUB 2,000 Bryansk Regional Court 10/03/2021   and   Bryansk Regional Court 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings     31695/21 12/05/2021 Aleksey Anatolyevich KARIKH 1991 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   St Petersburg, 02/02/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO 14 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 11/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 02-03/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect   33900/21* 03/06/2021 Sergey Aleksandrovich KAN 1986 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Cheboksary, 23/01/2021     Anticorruption rally   Cheboksary, 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000             5 days of detention Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic 19/02/2021         Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic 30/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 30/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention in the proceedings related to the rally on 21/04/2021; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect   34698/21 18/06/2021 Mariya Aleksandrovna YURCHENKO 1998 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg Rally against amendments to the Constitution   St Petersburg, 15/03/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 22/12/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 15/03/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   34898/21* 03/06/2021 Sergey Aleksandrovich CHEREDNIK 1980 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 14 days of detention Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   35155/21* 25/06/2021 Dmitriy Alekseyevich SMIRNOV 1992   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 17/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   35158/21* 25/06/2021 Artem Nikolayevich LAPIN 1983   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   35189/21* 18/06/2021 Andrey Vladimirovich BORTNIKOV 1997   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 8 days of detention Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect   35191/21* 18/06/2021 Aleksandra Aleksandrovna KLYUKA 1995   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 20/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   35192/21* 18/06/2021 Artem Sergeyevich MARTIROSOV 1999   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   36361/21* 30/06/2021 Andrey Viktorovich DRUZHININ 1987   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 26/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   36372/21* 30/06/2021 Tatyana Andreyevna MASLOVA 1991   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Tyumen, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Tyumen Regional Court 15/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   36390/21* 30/06/2021 Nikolay Igorevich IVANOV 1992   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 14/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   36732/21* 07/07/2021 Rostislav Vladimirovich NEKENOV 1987 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Protest action   Moscow, 07/11/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 22/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 07/11/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   36767/21* 13/07/2021 Yekarerina Aleksandrovna PONOMAREVA 1996 Konstantin Aleksandrovich Markin Velikiy Novgorod Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Novgorod, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Novgorod Regional Court 25/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   36884/21* 12/07/2021 Mikhail Mikhaylovich DEYEV 1998 Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 15 days of detention Moscow City Court 11/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 03/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect   36929/21* 16/07/2021 Fedor Gennadyevich PARSHIKOV 2002   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 8 days of detention Moscow City Court 08/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after the compiling of the offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect   36968/21* 16/07/2021 Mikhail Vladimirovich IVANOV 1991   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   St Petersburg, 23/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station after the compiling of an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   37333/21* 08/07/2021 Yevgeniy Gennadyevich KALKAYEV 1977 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   37815/21* 12/07/2021 Andrey Viktorovich NAZAROV 1992 Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 15 days of detention Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect   38199/21 13/07/2021 Maksim Vladimirovich YEVSIN 1992 Yuliya Vladimirovna Zatonskaya Lipetsk Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Lipetsk, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Lipetsk Regional Court 25/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   38370/21* 02/07/2021 Dmitriy Sergeyevich DOLGIKH 1993   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   St Petersburg, 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   38403/21* 02/07/2021 Dmitriy Sergeyevich VOLKOV 1986   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Pskov, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Pskov Regional Court 26/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   38547/21* 24/07/2021 Vladimir Sergeyevich NEMANOV 1996 Polina Artemovna Petrova Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 04/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   38986/21* 22/07/2021 Oleg Valeryevich IVANOV 1997   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Stavropol, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Stavropol Regional Court 28/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   39153/21 19/07/2021 Sergey Petrovich SEROV 1997 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Kazan, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of Tatarstan Republic 12/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   39215/21* 28/07/2021 Guzel Salavatovna VASIKOVA 1992   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Kazan, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of Tatarstan Republic 31/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   39345/21* 22/07/2021 Igor Svyatoslavovich SHAPOVALOV 1991   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Moscow, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   46922/21 30/08/2021 Aleksandr Nikolayevich ZHELTUKHIN 1986 Ruslan Yuryevich Bannikov Voronezh Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Voronezh, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 7 days of detention Voronezh Regional Court 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 22-23/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 29 juin 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-226121
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel