CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 août 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .s1DE04B9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } Published on 4 September 2023   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 26597/23 Liiban Abdirisaak AHMADI against Denmark lodged on 30 June 2023 communicated on 14 August 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s confinement from 28   December   2020 at 11.50 a.m. to 8 January 2021 at 1.10 p.m. to a restraint bed in a high security psychiatric facility ( Sikringafdelingen ). The applicant appealed against the confinement to the Psychiatric Patients’ Complaints Board, which found against him. Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant brought compensation proceedings before the courts. By a judgment of 21   November 2022, which became final on 17 May 2023, the High Court found the confinement lawful and rejected the applicant’s claim for compensation.     QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the confinement of the applicant to a restraint bed from 28   December   2020 at 11.50 a.m. to 8 January 2021 at 1.10 p.m. in breach of Article   3 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Aggerholm v. Denmark , no.   45439/18, 15 September 2020)?