CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 août 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s41AC1870 { width:92.52%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sE110381E { width:8.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .s8B598233 { width:43.66%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s65AD88B6 { width:27.12%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s42589970 { width:20.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s8FDBB2A7 { width:8.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s9145935 { width:43.66%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF45A8C2B { width:27.12%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1467DF41 { width:20.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .sE1FDE089 { height:73.85pt } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sB660AF9F { height:166.5pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 18 September 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no. 37308/21 Feride YURTKENT and Others against Türkiye lodged on 16 July 2021 communicated on 28 August 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the non-execution of decisions delivered by the Silvan Civil (Labour) Court, whereby the intestator, whose heirs are the applicants, was awarded compensation for his receivables arising from labour agreements with the Silvan Municipality. Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, the applicants complain about the continuing non-execution of the final judicial decisions awarding compensation to the intestator. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and their right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, on account of the authorities’ failure to execute the final judicial decisions delivered by the Silvan Civil (Labour) Court (see Hornsby v.   Greece , 19 March 1997, §§ 40-45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) , no. 33509/04, §§   65-87, ECHR 2009 and also Tetik and Others v.   Turkey [Committee], nos. 25885/19 and 37 others, §§   16-17, 15 March 2022)? APPENDIX 1 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality 1. Feride YURTKENT 1977 Turkish 2. Kader AFŞAR 1982 Turkish 3. Ferihe EYYÜPOĞLU 1979 Turkish 4. Gülbahar YURTKENT 1991 Turkish 5. Gülbin YURTKENT 1999 Turkish 6. İrfan YURTKENT 1990 Turkish 7. Şeyhmus YURTKENT 1985 Turkish 8. Tacdin YURTKENT 1968 Turkish     APPENDIX 2   App. No. Case Title Silvan Civil (Labour) Court ’s Decision   Compensation Commission Decision Execution Order Constitutional Court`s Decision 37308/21 Feride Yurtkent and Others v. Türkiye Docket No: 2008/78   Decision No: 2009/236   Date of the Decision: 11/06/2009 Docket No: 2019/2496   Decision No: 2020/1367   Date of the Decision: 15/05/2020 Execution proceeding No: 2020/6762 (2010/181)   Date of the First Execution Order: 06/01/2010 Individual Application No: 2020/24398   Date: 30/03/2021