CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 septembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } Published on 2 October 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no.   43191/21 Ivan Nikolayevich KIRSANOV against Russia and 22 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 7 September 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     43191/21* 11/08/2021 Ivan Nikolayevich KIRSANOV 2002 Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev Kazan Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Kazan, Tatarstan Republic 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 17/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 24/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal.     45710/21* 26/08/2021 Viktoriya Andreyevna KURBATOVA 1994 Dmitriy Vladimirovich Zubarev Vladivostok Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Vladivostok 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Primorye Regional Court 20/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 8.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 20/05/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     45886/21* 25/08/2021 Andrey Valentinovich ZELENOV 1975 Konstantin Vladimirovich Bubon Khabarovsk Manifestation in support of Furgal and Navalnyy   Khabarovsk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Khabarovsk Regional Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 23/01/2021 to 25/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal.     46095/21 03/09/2021 Yelena Yuryevna IPATOVA 1977 Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Severodvinsk 23/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 04/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.31 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 04/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     47509/21* 03/09/2021 Anton Aleksandrovich SUKHANOV 1993 Feliks Yevgenyevich Vertegel Krasnodar Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Krasnodar 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 15/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 15/03/2021.     47833/21 18/09/2021 Aleksandr Pavlovich SMIRNOV 1987 Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 5.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to about 1.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 06/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     48934/21* 24/09/2021 Yelena Aleksandrovna PIROGOVA 1960 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Stariy Oskol 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 29/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.30 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Belgorod Regional Court, 29/03/2021.     49150/21* 16/09/2021 Yuliya Sergeyevna DEMIDOVA 1997 Irina Aleksandrovna Yatsenko Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.00   p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 9.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 16/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     49272/21* 22/09/2021 Aleksandr Vladimirovich VOLKOV 1991 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 22/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.09 p.m. until unspecified time on 23/01/2021 (more than three hours) for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   49428/21* 01/10/2021 Igor Olegovich YERMACHENKOV 1963 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Arkhangelsk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court 09/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 09/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   49437/21* 01/10/2021 Artur Arturovich SIDOROV 1992 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Yaroslavl 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 08/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.20 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Yaroslavl Regional Court, 08/04/2021.   51211/21* 30/09/2021 Irada Nazimovna KAMINSKAYA 1972 Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina Novorossiysk Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Anapa, Krasnodar Region 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 31/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 1.10 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 31/03/2021.   51498/21* 28/09/2021 Vladimir Vladimirovich KALASHNIKOV 1982 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 20/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.10 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   51504/21* 28/09/2021 Yuriy Vladimirovich ZAYTSEV 1962 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 13/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 6.25 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 13/05/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   51701/21* 05/10/2021 Maksim Yuryevich TARASOV 1998 Andrey Olegovich Valenkov Nizhniy Novgorod Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 07/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 07/04/2021.   51790/21* 15/10/2021 Anastasiya Igorevna RODIONOVA 1992 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Saransk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic 28/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic, 28/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   51936/21* 15/10/2021 Yana Valeryevna FOMINA 1994 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Kursk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Kursk Regional Court 27/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.55 p.m. to 7.15 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Kursk Regional Court, 27/04/2021.   52341/21* 01/10/2021 Darina Ruslanovna PRAZDNIKOVA 2002 Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev Kazan Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Kazan 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 21/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Supreme Court of Tatarstan Republic, 21/04/2021.   53163/21* 23/09/2021 Yan Vladimirovich KOLCHANOV 1983 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Ekaterinburg 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community service Sverdlovsk Regional Court 13/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 13/05/2021.   53169/21 23/09/2021 Aleksey Vladimirovich CHELYSHEV 1995 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Ekaterinburg 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community service Sverdlovsk Regional Court 09/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 3.27 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/20201 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 09/06/2021.   53174/21 23/09/2021 Timofey Vasilyevich RADYA 1988 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Ekaterinburg 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 39 hours of community service Sverdlovsk Regional Court 13/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 3.27 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/20201 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 13/07/2021.   57560/21* 07/11/2021 Mukhamad Amridin SIRIDZHIDINZODA 1999 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Manifestation in support of Izzat Amon   Moscow 02/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 13/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.00   p.m. to unspecified time on 02/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 13/07/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   51290/22* 22/10/2022 Rustem Rinatovich NABIULLIN 1996 Rim Faridovich Sabirov Kazan Manifestation against the war in Ukraine   Kazan 13/03/2022     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO       article 20.3.3 of CAO, § 1 fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 30,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 22/06/2022   Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 06/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 13/03/2022 to 14/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal.