CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 septembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s977DAF3C { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } Published on 2 October 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no.   38070/21 Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV against Russia and 30 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 7 September 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     38070/21* 14/07/2021 Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV 1996 Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 12/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/03/2021;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     38179/21* 16/07/2021 Filipp Freddiyevich KADENA 1996   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 26/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.22 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 6.57 a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     41042/21* 23/07/2021 Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV 2000 Georgiy Eduardovich Tevosov Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 03/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 7 days Moscow City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) (c) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 00.15 a.m. on 03/02/2021 to 04/02/2021, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 30/03/2021.     41079/21 28/07/2021 Daniil Antonovich SHESTAKOV 1997 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally in support to Mr A. Navalnyy   Perm 23/01/2021   Rally (march) in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Perm 31/01/2021   Hybrid political rally (demonstration and march)   Perm 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           fine of RUB 10,000           administrative detention of 10 days Perm Regional Court 13/04/2021         Perm Regional Court 03/09/2021         Perm Regional Court 30/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”: - from 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 (few hours after the end of the rally) to 00.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021, while the record of administrative offence was drawn up later, and the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was not recorded in any way, - from 1.40 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021, - from 3.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021 to 23/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of the administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Perm City Court, 13/04/2021, 30/04/2021 and 03/09/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s three convictions were based;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     43685/21* 16/08/2021 Fedor Konstantinovich KOLESNICHENKO 1995 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support to Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     45063/21* 02/09/2021 Anastasiya Aleksandrovna POPOVA 1992 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Syvtyrkar, Komi Republic 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.55 p.m. to 09.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     45070/21* 09/08/2021 Varvara Yuryevna ZHARKAYA 1983 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Karavayev Nizhniy Novgorod Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     45707/21* 26/08/2021 Aleksandra Olegovna VORONINA 1991 Dmitriy Vladimirovich Zubarev Vladivostok Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Vladivostok 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of   RUB 15,000 Primorye Regional Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.10 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 30/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     46123/21* 10/09/2021 Sergey Valeryevich GOROKHOV 1974     Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Volgograd 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Volgograd Regional Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.45 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021; Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - solo picketing on 23/01/2021 in Volgograd; administrative conviction under Art. 20.2 § 5 of the CAO to a fine of RUB 10,000. Final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   46221/21* 10/09/2021 Konstantin Olegovich ZARUBA 1990 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   46413/21* 18/08/2021 Ayyyskhan Ivanovich ALEKSEYEV 1987 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Yakutsk 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic 19/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, 19/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s convictions were based;   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the Internet for a rally in support to Mr A. Navalny scheduled for 23/01/2021, administrative conviction under Art. 20.2 § 21 of the CAO, fine of RUB 10,000. Final decision: the Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, 19/03/2021.   46427/21 03/09/2021 Vladislav Romanovich KACHEROV 2000 Feliks Yevgenyevich Vertegel Krasnodar Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Krasnodar 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention of 1 day Krasnodar Regional Court 15/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 15/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   46699/21* 17/09/2021 Yekaterina Mikhaylovna VANSLOVA 1990 Mariya Aleksandrovna Zadorozhnaya Nizhniy Novgorod Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) (c) - unlawful pre-trial detention: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   47009/21* 15/09/2021 Yelena Valeriyevna YEVSEYEVA 1977 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Saransk, Republic of Mordovia 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic, 24/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   47891/21 07/09/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich DYADKIN 1969 Inna Viktorovna Kosheleva Kirov Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Kirov 23/01/2021   Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Kirov 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           fine of RUB 10,000 Kirov Regional Court 09/03/2021         Kirov Regional Court 25/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Kirov Regional Court, 09/03/2021 and 25/05/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s convictions were based.     48359/21* 23/09/2021 Denis Aleksandrovich TASKIN 1990 Andrey Olegovich Valenkov Nizhniy Novgorod Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 24/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   49416/21* 01/10/2021 Vladislav Kirillovich SHTUKATUROV 1997 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support to Mr A. Navalnyy   Ryazan 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Ryazan Regional Court 08/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 10.25 a.m. on 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Ryazan Regional Court, 08/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     49480/21* 01/10/2021 Oleg Nikolayevich TOTSKIY 2002 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally in support to Mr A. Navalnyy   Vladivostok 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO   fine of RUB 10,000 Primorye Regional Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 01/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 12/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   49512/21* 01/10/2021 Ron Igorevich DEYCH 2000 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy     Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 07/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2010, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 07/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   49677/21* 16/09/2021 Angelina Vladimirovna BURDAKOVA 1994 Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev Kazan Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Kazan 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 31/03/2021     49679/21* 17/09/2021 Yelena Vasilyevna GULINA 1968 Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Syktyvkar 23/01/2021   Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy     Syktyvkar 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 12/05/2021       Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 and 12/05/2021.   49714/21 17/09/2021 Kirill Alekseyevich FOKIN 1999 Vladislav Vladimirovich Kosnyrev Syktyvkar Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Syktyvkar 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.00 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.   49723/21 17/09/2021 Galina Aleksandrovna LOGINOVSKIKH 1965 Vladislav Vladimirovich Kosnyrev Syktyvkar Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Syktyvkar 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.45 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.   50084/21* 24/09/2021 Ilya Andreyevich YUDIN 1993     Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Samara 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention of 7 days Samara Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 9.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Samara Regional Court, 01/04/2021.   50105/21* 21/09/2021 Yekaterina Yuryevna SURIKOVA 2002 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of   RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.15 p.m. to 10.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   50417/21* 29/09/2021 Aleksandr Valeryevich YEGOROV 1994 Ilya Valeryevich Tkachenko Gatchina Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 30/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   50477/21* 29/09/2021 Yevgeniy Sergeyevich DRUSHCHENKO 1990 Feliks Yevgenyevich Vertegel Krasnodar Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Krasnodar 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 31/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 31/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   50671/21* 29/09/2021 Daniil Vladimirovich PROKOPENKO 1991 Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina Novorossiysk Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Anapa 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 18,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 29/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.50 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 29/03/2021.   50901/21* 01/10/2021 Andrey Konstantinovich ROMANOV 1998 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally in support of Mr   A.   Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO community works of 30 hours Moscow City Court 22/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   50963/21 30/09/2021 Aleksandr Yuryevich PESKOV 1996 Aleksey Mikhaylovich Kuroptev Balashikha Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Cherepovets 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of   RUB 20,000 Vologda Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.55 a.m. to 04.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the Internet to participate in an unauthorised rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy, scheduled for 31/01/2021, administrative conviction under Art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s convictions were based.   51387/21* 30/09/2021 Yakov Valeryevich KRASOVSKIY 1998   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg 21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 8 days St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 27/04/2021;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.50 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 7.10 p.m. on 22/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.