CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 octobre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 30 October 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   4562/23 Anton Aleksandrovich MALGAZHDAROV against Russia and 8 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 October 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016, and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, 7 February 2017).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Location Date Purpose of the demonstration Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Date Name of the court Other relevant information Other complaints under well-established case-law     4562/23* 11/01/2023 Anton Aleksandrovich MALGAZHDAROV 1990 Tatyana Aleksandrovna Belova Moscow Moscow, 05/01/2022, Support of protests in Kazakhstan article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   10,000 15/09/2022, Moscow City Court distance requirement - event classified as assembly post facto Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention (i) on 05/01/2022 and (ii) on 06/03/2022, each time for the sole purpose of drawing up an offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (first set of proceedings, final judgment of 15/09/2022, Moscow City Court),   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (first set of proceedings, final judgment of 15/09/2022),   Art. 11 (2) - disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies - Rally against the war in Ukraine held on 06/03/2022 in Moscow, arrest and conviction under article 20.2 § 5 CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final judgment: 29/09/2022, Moscow City Court     4699/23* 17/01/2023 Aleksandr Vladimirovich SHEVCHENKO 1980     Moscow, 24/02/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   20,000 21/09/2022, Moscow City Court ban on public events at certain locations, Red Square       5446/23* 22/01/2023 Taisiya Yevgenyevna YAZRIKOVA 1987     Moscow, 26/02/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   20,000 13/10/2022, Moscow City Court   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 26/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence     6877/23* 24/01/2023 Mikhail Aleksandrovich SALOMATIN 1981     Moscow, 05/03/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   15,000 27/09/2022, Moscow City Court         8507/23* 19/01/2023 Anna Vladimirovna DANILINA 1988     Moscow, 06/03/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   10,000 19/09/2022, Moscow City Court   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and escorting to a police station, detention there on 06/03/2023 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence     9548/23* 09/02/2023 Varvara Vladimirovna OBROSOVA 1986     Moscow, 27/02/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   20,000 11/10/2022, Moscow City Court   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 27/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of an administrative offence     11234/23* 11/02/2023 Natalya Viktorovna LADYGINA 1964     Moscow, 26/02/2022. Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   10,000 11/10/2022, Moscow City Court   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest and escorting to a police station on 26/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an offence record     12071/23* 25/02/2023 Olga Gennadyevna NIKITINA 1983 Polina Artemovna Petrova Moscow Moscow, 02/03/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   20,000 25/10/2022 Moscow City Court   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station on 02/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence     12357/23* 17/02/2023 Polina Valeryevna KUZAVLEVA 1986 Nataliya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Moscow, 05/03/2022, Protest against the war in Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,   fine of RUB   20,000 17/10/2022 Moscow City Court Tying green ribbons to street poles Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – arrest, escorting to the police station on 05/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence