CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 octobre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sAF2A08ED { color:#c00000 } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } Published on 30 October 2023   FIRST SECTION Application no.   14858/21 Georgiy Sergeyevich PARAMOSHIN against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 October 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     14858/21 25/02/2021 Georgiy Sergeyevich PARAMOSHIN 2001 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Manifestation against constitutional amendments   Moscow   15/07/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 26/08/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 15/07/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Art. 6 (1) and Article 6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     15094/21 24/02/2021 Sergey Igorevich ZHOGOL 1999   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation against constitutional amendments   Moscow, Pushkinskaya Square   15/07/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 26/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 15/07/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     18545/21* 21/03/2021 Sergey Grigoryevich ALEKSANDROV 1993 Maksim Leonidovich Pashkov Moskva Manifestation in support of A.   Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 9 days of administrative arrest Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention –escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours.     20301/21* 14/03/2021 Dmitriy Igorevich KOROVIN 1997 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally to support Sergey Furgal   Krasnoyarsk   15/08/2020 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 25,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 01/10/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention –escorting to the police station on 15/08/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours.   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     23982/21 19/04/2021 Inna Vladimirovna PONOMAREVA 1973 Andrey Gennadyevich Lepekhin Chelyabinsk Rally to support Sergey Furgal   Chelyabinsk   15/08/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Chelyabinsk Regional Court 28/10/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     24494/21 14/04/2021 Andrey Vadimovich MORAR 2000 Vitaliy Viktorovich Cherkasov St Petersburg Manifestation against the Government of Russia   Moscow   07/11/2020 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO 15 days of administrative arrest Moscow City Court 11/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention –escorting to the police station on 07/11/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court one of the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 09/11/2020 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     25566/21* 19/04/2021 Kirill Dmitriyevich ALEKSEYEV 1989 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy   Vladimir   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Vladimir Regional Court 11/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     25929/21* 01/05/2021 Georgiy Mikhaylovich SMIRNOV 2002 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 10 days of administrative arrest Moscow City Court 29/01/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to police station on 23/01/2021 for the purpose of drawing up a record of offence, detention in excess of 3 hours;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     26061/21* 01/05/2021 Boris Arnoldovich ODINTSOV 1971 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 10 days of administrative arrest Moscow City Court 29/01/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for the purpose of drawing up a record of offence, detention in excess of 3 hours     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   28595/21 02/05/2021 Arina Valentinovna BORODINA 1973 Alan Olegovich Gamazov Moscow Manifestation in support of Ivan Safronov   Moscow   13/07/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 20/11/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;     Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 13/07/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours