CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 octobre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } Published on 30 October 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   45057/21 Yuriy Sergeyevich KOKSHIN against Russia and 32 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 October 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     45057/21* 25/08/2021 Yuriy Sergeyevich KOKSHIN 1995 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Staryy Oskol   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 15/03/2021       45058/21* 02/09/2021 Yuliya Igorevna SEMAKHINA 1984 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of   A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     46111/21* 10/09/2021 Alena Romanovna SHUVAYEVA 1998 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Kuznetsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   12,000 Penza Regional Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     46818/21* 10/09/2021 Aleksandr Vasilyevich KIBANOV 1990 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of   A. Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based     46824/21* 10/09/2021 Pavel Grigoryevich ZAMYSHLYAYEV 1988 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings)     47101/21* 15/09/2021 Andrey Andreyevich LACHUGIN 1998 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021       47458/21* 15/09/2021 Sergey Vasilyevich SOLOMONOV 1972 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Komsomolsk-on-Amur   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Khabarovsk Regional Court 23/03/2021       47718/21* 15/09/2021 Olga Borisovna MULERIS 1994 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Kaliningrad   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 Kaliningrad Regional Court 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings)     48655/21* 24/09/2021 Vyacheslav Leonidovich USTENKO 2000 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art.   27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the domestic proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   6668/22* 14/01/2022 Vladimir Igorevich PANOV 1997   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 15/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art.   27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v.Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained of the inability to confront the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based   6669/22* 14/01/2022 Maksim Georgiyevich GEORGIYEV 2002   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 15/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   6672/22* 18/01/2022 Pavel Viktorovich TOMAS 1992   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 19/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings -   6679/22* 18/01/2022 Danila Dmitriyevich YEROFEYEV 1998   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 20/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   6687/22* 18/01/2022 Irina Vladimirovna SIDOROVA 1975   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Pskov   21/04/2021 article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   3,000 Pskov Regional Court 19/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   6690/22* 18/01/2022 Albina Alekseyevna LEONOVA 2002   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Pskov   21/04/2021 article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   3,000 Pskov Regional Court 19/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   6692/22* 18/01/2022 Kseniya Aleksandrovna NASLEDNIKOVA 1987   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Shopino 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   5,000 Belgorod Regional Court 19/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   7178/22* 31/01/2022 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich DERREK 1998 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Yaroslavl   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 15/09/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   7503/22* 31/01/2022 Anna Andreyevna ZNAMENSKAYA 1992 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of   A. Navalnyy   Perm   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   7,000 Perm Regional Court 26/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   7508/22* 31/01/2022 Aleksandr Galizhonovich KHAYROV 1991 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Krasnodar   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 04/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained of the inability to confront the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based   7630/22* 31/01/2022 Svetlana Yuryevna PENDRIKOVA 1976 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of   A. Navalnyy   Murom   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   11,000 Vladimir Regional Court 25/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   7646/22* 31/01/2022 Darya Yevgenyevna UTENKOVA 2002 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Bratsk   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Irkutsk Regional Court 12/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   7699/22* 31/01/2022 Aleksandr Nikolayevich GRAB 1984 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 03/08/2021     9092/22* 10/02/2022 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BOGDASHEVSKIY 1991 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 23/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention pm 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   9116/22* 10/02/2022 Aleksandra Vadimovna KAMKINA 1999 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Yaroslavl   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 25/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings -   11939/22* 23/02/2022 Amir Tagirovich KUTYYEV 1999 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   4,000 Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St Petersburg 09/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - The applicant complained of being taken to a police station as an administrative suspect on 23/01/2021: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect.,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   11946/22* 23/02/2022 Aleksey Alekseyevich DYKIN 1985 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Lipetsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Lipetsk Regional Court 07/10/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   17296/22* 20/03/2022 Andrey Vladimirovich OSECHKIN 1977 Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov St Petersburg Rally in support of   A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     17298/22* 20/03/2022 Nikita Yuryevich YELPANOV 1997 Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- Arrest and detention on 31/01/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   17301/22* 20/03/2022 Mariya Viktorovna SOKOL 2000 Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   17305/22* 20/03/2022 Nikolay Aleksandrovich ZAYTSEV 1991 Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   17308/22* 20/03/2022 Ilya Aleksandrovich SKVORTSOV 1999 Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov St Petersburg Rally in support of   A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   53830/22* 21/10/2022 Dmitriy Vladimirovich DANILTSEV 1986     Rally against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine two police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.   53833/22 27/10/2022 Kseniya Aleksandrovna KASHTANKINA 1981     Rally against the war in Ukraine   Ulyanovsk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative fine of RUB   10,000 Ulyanovsk Regional Court 30/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019); Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings