CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s85E2A1C4 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #949494; border-collapse:collapse } .sD271F6F6 { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s3E08F9CA { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC54D2024 { border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF42CB81 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85D71A24 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3DE46EBF { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD3B88E32 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA30831E3 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s973C4529 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } Published on 27 November 2023   FOURTH SECTION Application no.   4041/16 Aleksandr Anatolyevich SHELKOVENKOV and Nikita Olegovich TRUBITSYN against Russia and 21 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     4041/16* 25/12/2015 Aleksandr Anatolyevich SHELKOVENKOV 1995   Nikita Olegovich TRUBITSYN 1988 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Rally to support I. Dadin   Moscow, 17/11/2015 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 5 days of detention (Shelkovenkov)   3 days of detention (Trubitsyn) Moscow City Court 20/11/2015     Moscow City Court 20/11/2015 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings against each applicant,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting each applicant.     13061/18* 14/03/2018 Andrey Sergeyevich PIVOVAROV 1981   Sergey Aleksandrovich Golubok Vilnius Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 28/01/2018     Protest rally   Moscow, 01/07/2020     Rally against the constitutional amendments   Moscow, 15/07/2020 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO         article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 3 of CAO 25 days of detention         10 days of detention         14 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 05/03/2018       Moscow City Court 21/09/2020         Moscow City Court 08/09/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in three sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in the 2018 case.     59645/18* 06/12/2018 Yuliya Viktorovna SHEVCHENKO 1999   Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Opposition rally   Cheboksary, 05/05/2018           Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Cheboksary, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work     20 hours of community work       fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic 08/06/2018   Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic 08/06/2018     Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic 16/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in three sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in the 2021 case,     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - Final decisions in both set of proceedings - 08/06/2018, Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic, Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution and punishment in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings concerning the same "hybrid" rally on 05/05/2018.     4737/19* 05/12/2018 Tatyana Alekseyevna PAMFILOVA 1999   Kseniya Mikhaylovna Korchilova St Petersburg Opposition rally   St Petersburg, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000     fine of RUB 700 St Petersburg City Court 05/06/2018   St Petersburg City Court 05/06/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - following the appeal decision in the case under Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO the applicant was also finally convicted, for substantially the same facts, in the case under Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO.     7131/19* 21/01/2019 Vladimir Mikhaylovich SINYAKOV 1948   Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Opposition rally   Kaliningrad, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Kaliningrad Regional Court 09/08/2018       7588/19* 16/01/2019 Timur Gabdelbaryyevich GATAULLIN 1986   Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov Kazan Rally against the pension reform   Kazan, 09/09/2018     Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Kazan, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000           fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 19/12/2018       Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 05/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 09-10/09/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings in 2018.     7931/19* 16/01/2019 Vadim Olegovich STEPANOV 1995   Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov Kazan Rally against the pension reform   Kazan, 09/09/2018 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 4 days of detention Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 18/09/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 09-10/09/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - Right of appeal against criminal conviction/sentence - immediate execution of the sentence of administrative detention; an appeal against it had no suspensive effect.     8487/19* 04/02/2019 Mikhail Yuryevich POSTNIKOV 1991   Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov Kazan Rally against the pension reform   Kazan, 09/09/2018 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 10 days of detention Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 29/12/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 27-28/12/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 09/09/2018,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - Right of appeal against criminal conviction/sentence - immediate execution of the sentence of administrative detention; an appeal against it had no suspensive effect.     11466/19* 02/02/2019 Danila Andreyevich SARTAKOV 1996   Olga Sergeyevna Bederson Perm Opposition rally   Perm, 05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Perm Regional Court 02/08/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     24946/19* 09/04/2019 Bogdan Vladimirovich LEVIN 1998   Maksim Vladimirovich Olenichev St Petersburg Rally against the pension reform   St Petersburg, 09/09/2018 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 09/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - 09-10/09/2018 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.   25368/19* 30/04/2019 Leonid Gennadyevich MURZAYEV 1970   Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Rally against the pension reform   Perm, 09/09/2018 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO 180 hours of community work Perm Regional Court 31/10/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.   7962/21* 26/12/2020 Sergey Vladimirovich FOMIN 1983   Svetlana Nikolayevna Bayturina Moscow Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow, 27/07/2019 article 20.2 § 3 of CAO fine of RUB 30,000 Moscow City Court 26/06/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 24/12/2019 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.   28057/21* 17/05/2021 Danil Sergeyevich MESHCHERYAKOV 1991   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Barnaul, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   28058/21* 17/05/2021 Dmitriy Vladimirovich BUDKOV 1990   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Barnaul, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 25/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.   28112/21* 17/05/2021 Aleksey Aleksandrovich YELYSHEV 1998   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Barnaul, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   28117/21* 17/05/2021 Sofya Andreyevna BELOUSOVA 1997   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A.   Navalnyy   Barnaul, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   28154/21* 17/05/2021 Vladislav Sergeyevich GERASIMOV 2000   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Barnaul, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 10/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   30208/21* 12/05/2021 Danil Yuryevich SHTIL 1997   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Barnaul, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   30462/21 11/05/2021 Dmitriy Vladimirovich MELNIKOV 1967   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Barnaul, 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 01/02/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   36789/21 05/07/2021 Yelena Vladimirovna MIKHAYLOVA 1992   Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov St Petersburg Rally to support A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg, 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO 10 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of detention; an appeal against it had no suspensive effect.   40294/21* 27/07/2021 Andrey Vitalyevich KATAMANOV 1996   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Barnaul, 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Altay Regional Court 03/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   51059/21 05/10/2021 Bogdan Gennadyevich LITVIN 1994   Sergey Aleksandrovich Loktev St Petersburg Rally (performance) to support Twitter   St Petersburg, 30/03/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 7 days of detention St Petersburg City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 30/03/2021 and 01/04/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.