CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } Published on 27 November 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   37290/19 Yuriy Valeryevich LITVIN against Russia and 10 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     37290/19* 24/06/2019 Yuriy Valeryevich LITVIN 1996 Dmitriy Igorevich Zakhvatov Moscow Manifestation against the isolation of the Russian segment of the Internet   Moscow   10/03/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 24/04/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 10/03/2019 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hours statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     41334/19* 14/07/2019 Vyacheslav Gennadyevich FITLIN 1979 Andzhelika Viktorovna Chernyavskaya Oktyabrskiy Rally against pension reform   Novosibirsk   09/09/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Novosibirsk Regional Court 15/01/2019       10332/21 15/01/2021 Nikolay Vladimirovich SHAROV 1986 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Manifestation against the construction of South-East Highway   Moscow   19/03/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 18/08/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 19/03/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   Art. 6 (1) and Art. 6 (3) (d) – unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     11096/21 01/02/2021 Pavel Aleksandrovich BUKHSHTAB 1980   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation against the construction of South-East Highway   Moscow   19/03/2020 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   1,000 Moscow City Court 18/08/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 19/03/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention at the police station beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     11102/21 01/02/2021 Konstantin Dmitriyevich KAMENSKIY 2000   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation against the construction of South-East Highway   Moscow   19/03/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 20/08/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 19/03/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     11608/21* 19/02/2021 Galina Ivanovna NEKRASOVA 1976 Mariya Vladimirovna Bontsler Kaliningrad Rally to support Sergey Furgal   Kaliningrad   08/08/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Kaliningrad Regional Court 19/11/2020       11676/21* 05/02/2021 Aleksandr Gennadyevich ROSTOVSKIY 1982 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Manifestation against the construction of South-East Highway   Moscow   19/03/2020 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   1,000 Moscow City Court 18/08/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 19/03/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     13234/21 01/03/2021 Artur Pavlovich DAVIDYAN 1980 Timofey Borisovich Ushakov Kokoshkino Manifestation to commemorate the fallen in the Second World War   Moscow   22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 02/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 22/06/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     13241/21 01/03/2021 Eldar Esenbulatovich KAMBULATOV 1988 Timofey Borisovich Ushakov Kokoshkino Manifestation to commemorate the fallen in the Second World War   Moscow   22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 02/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 22/06/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   14838/21* 25/02/2021 Ildar Ilgizovich GIZATULLIN 1991 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Rally against constitutional amendments   Moscow   15/07/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   20 000 Moscow City Court 04/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 15/07/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   38912/21* 12/07/2021 Anastasiya Vladimirovna FILIPCHENKOVA 1999 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings