CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 December 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no. 52638/21 HİZMET İŞ SENDİKASI GENEL BAŞKANLIĞI against Türkiye lodged on 6 October 2021 communicated on 21 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the non-execution of a decision delivered by the Ankara 18 th Labour Court, whereby the applicant union was awarded compensation to be paid by the Düziçi Municipality. Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant union complains about the continuing non ‑ execution of the final judicial decision awarding compensation. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant union’s right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and of its right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention, on account of the authorities’ failure to execute the final judicial decision delivered by the Ankara 18 th Labour Court (see Hornsby v.   Greece , 19 March 1997, §§ 40-45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) , no. 33509/04, §§ 65-87, ECHR 2009; and also Tetik and Others v.   Turkey [Committee], nos. 25885/19 and 37 others, §§   16-17, 15 March 2022)?