CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 18 December 2023   FIRST SECTION Application no. 909/21 Giulio PUCCINI against Italy and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 27 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the decisions of the Court of Cassation to declare the applicants’ appeals on points of law inadmissible for failure to comply with the formal requirements provided for by Article 366 § 1, nos.   3 and   6, of the Code of Civil Procedure and with the principle of the autonomy of the appeal on points of law ( autosufficienza del ricorso in cassazione ). The applicants, relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, complain that they were deprived of access to a court. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the dismissal of the appeals by the Court of Cassation on formal grounds impose a disproportionate restriction on the applicants’ right to access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Succi and   Others v.   Italy , nos. 55064/11 and 2 others, §§ 71-85, 28 October 2021)?   2.     In particular, was the application of these formal requirements provided for by Article 366 § 1, nos. 3 and 6, of the Code of Civil Procedure and with the principle of the autonomy of the appeal on points of law compatible with the Court’s case-law on “excessive formalism” (see, among many others, Zubac v.   Croatia [GC], no. 40160/12, §§ 80-82, 87-89 and 96-99, 5   April 2018, and Succi and Others , cited above, 86-95)?     APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Introduction date Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration Place of residence Nationality Representative’s name Location Relevant domestic decision 1. 909/21 Puccini v. Italy 15/12/2020 Giulio PUCCINI 1969 San Romano in Garfagnana Italian Federico DI SALVO Florence Court of Cassation, R.G. 24388/17, order no. 11598, 15/06/2020 2. 23706/22 Pulcini v. Italy 29/04/2022 Renato PULCINI 2022 Borgosatollo Italian   Court of Cassation, R.G. 15083/20, order no. 276, 07/01/2022 3. 27751/22 Tecno Imac Srl v. Italy 25/05/2022 TECNO IMAC SRL 1999 Rome Italian Gianfranco GARONE Rome Court of Cassation, R.G. 35689/19, order no. 2441, 27/01/2022