CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 30 October 2023 and 18 December 2023   SECOND SECTION Applications nos. 19689/21 and 42794/22 Silvana ILIEVSKA against North Macedonia and Suzana ZDRAVEVA against North Macedonia lodged on 8 April 2021 and 26 August 2022 respectively communicated on 10 October 2023 and 30 November 2023   The Subject matter of the case and the initial questions to the parties, published on 30 October 2023, are available in HUDOC. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the proceedings for the applicant’s dismissal before the State Judicial Council (“the SJC”) and the Appeal Panel set up within the Supreme Court comply with the institutional requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see,   mutatis mutandis , Cotora v. Romania , no.   30745/18, §§   34-44, 17   January 2023; Eminağaoğlu v. Turkey , no. 76521/12, §§ 95-99, 9   March 2021; and Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos.   55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 131 et seq., 6 November 2018)?   2.     Did the Appeal Panel have “full jurisdiction” to review the decision of the SJC (see Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine , no.   21722/11, §§ 123-129, ECHR   2013)?