CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } Published on 8 January 2024   FIRST SECTION Application no.   42962/21 Eduard Eduardovich CHUBUROV against Russia and 23 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 30 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative offence Penalty Final decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     42962/21* 18/08/2021 Eduard Eduardovich CHUBUROV 1995 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St   Petersburg City Court 11/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 01.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 11/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.       43452/21* 23/08/2021 Valeriy Anatolyevich MAKHOTA 1988 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 04/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.50 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 08.45 a.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 04/05/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.       43465/21* 23/08/2021 Kristina Andreyevna NIKITCHENKO 1995 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 15/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 03.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case; the applicant spent more than 3 hours in the police van,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 15/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.     43911/21* 23/08/2021 Andrey Mikhaylovich MOZHAYEV 2000 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 7   days St   Petersburg City Court 04/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 04/05/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.     51710/21* 07/10/2021 Maksim Andreyevich KOLMAKOV 1988 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy   Yaroslavl   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 14/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 12.30 a.m. on 31/01/2021, detention for 2 hours;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Yaroslavl Regional Court, 14/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.     61316/21* 24/11/2021 Pavel Aleksandrovich PUSHKIN 1982 Konstantin Aleksandrovich Maltsev Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St   Petersburg City Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 01.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 00.10 a.m. on 01/02/2021; the applicant spent 4 hours in the police van,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 25/05/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence.     61373/21 17/11/2021 Grigoriy Aleksandrovich DONSKOY 1992 Ilya Vladimirovich Sivoldayev Voronezh Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Voronezh   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 17/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Voronezh Regional Court, 17/05/2021.     17436/22 20/03/2022 Yekaterina Timurovna YERMAK 2000 Mariya Sergeyevna Zyryanova St   Petersburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St   Petersburg City Court 21/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to an unspecified time on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - St   Petersburg City Court, 21/09/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based.     28786/22 01/03/2022 Viktor Anatolyevich SELEYKOV 1985 Mariya Sergeyevna Zyryanova St   Petersburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St   Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 03/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 10.05 p.m. on 22/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 03/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.   37030/22 13/07/2022 Olga Yevgenyevna GRIGORYEVA 1999 Luiza Magomedovna Magomedova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 5   days St   Petersburg City Court 15/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.20 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 26/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 15/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the code of administrative offences (CAO).   37187/22 13/07/2022 Mariya Sergeyevna BONDARENKO 2002 Luiza Magomedovna Magomedova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 5   days St   Petersburg City Court 15/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.20 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 26/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 15/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   37342/22 11/07/2022 Marina Aleksandrovna MAKEYEVA 2004 Sergey Aleksandrovich Loktev St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 St   Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from on 26/02/2022 in the evening to 27/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 12/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   38880/22 21/07/2022 Lidiya Ivanovna ISTOMINA 1994 Luiza Magomedovna Magomedova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 5   days St   Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.20 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 26/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 29/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - Right of appeal against criminal conviction/sentence - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   38884/22 21/07/2022 Tatyana Andreyevna POLITYKO 1994 Luiza Magomedovna Magomedova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 12   days St   Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.30 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 26/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 29/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   38885/22 21/07/2022 Natalya Vladimirovna NAUMOVA 1993 Luiza Magomedovna Magomedova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO administrative detention of 10   days St   Petersburg City Court 22/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.30 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 02.00 p.m. on 26/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 22/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   44451/22* 25/08/2022 Darya Nikolayevna ZHURAVLEVA 1994     Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 28/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 04.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 28/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   45014/22* 12/08/2022 Tatyana Vladimirovna KULIKOVA 1992 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   28/02/2022 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.30 p.m. on 28/02/2022 to 03.00 a.m. on 01/03/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case; the applicant spent 3h30 in the police van,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 12/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   48739/22* 29/09/2022 Yelizaveta Ilyinichna STRIK 1997     Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 02/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.51 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 2.15 p.m. on 28/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 02/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   48847/22 23/09/2022 Anastasiya Olegovna PYARI 1979   Leonid Leonidovich Krikun St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 24/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 9.00 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 4.00 p.m. on 26/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 24/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial two police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based.   50671/22* 23/09/2022 Aleksey Gennadyevich MAYOROV 1985       Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 24/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 2.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 24/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   51926/22* 14/10/2022 Olga Igorevna POLUKHINA 1991 Sergey Viktorovich Podolskiy St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   28/02/2022 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 St   Petersburg City Court 14/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.10 p.m. on 28/02/2022 to 4.15 p.m. on 01/03/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 14/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   52041/22* 01/10/2022 Yana Sergeyevna KOLOSOVA 2003     Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 02/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.50 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 8.00 p.m. on 28/02/2022, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 02/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   52123/22* 13/10/2022 Margarita Vasilyevna GABIDULLINA 1997 Nataliya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St   Petersburg City Court 14/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 1.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 14/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   30072/23* 12/03/2022 Vladimir Vladimirovich VOLOSHIN 1987 Daniil Alekseyevich Polyakov Voronezh Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Voronezh Voronezh   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 21/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 01.30 to 04.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Voronezh Regional Court, 21/09/2021.