CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 8 January 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no.   28623/21 Nikolay Sergeyevich BARYBIN against Russia and 11 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 30 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     28623/21* 16/05/2021 Nikolay Sergeyevich BARYBIN 1998 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 12 days Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three ‑ hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     40353/21 30/07/2021 Anatoliy Aleksandrovich BEREZIKOV 1983   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Rostov-on-Don   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Rostov Regional Court 15/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.     53280/21 06/10/2021 Stanislav Timofeyevich LUKYANOV 1964 Konstantin Mikhaylovich Zinovyev Nizhniy Novgorod Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 07/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.     54063/21* 14/10/2021 Andrey Rimovich KIRSANOVSKIY 1997 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Moscow City Court 23/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three ‑ hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.     33214/22 06/08/2021 Maksim Anatolyevich SIMONOV 1990 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg Anti-war protest   Yekaterinburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 18/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 26/02/2022 for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     37622/22 16/07/2022 Mikhail Mikhaylovich ZIMIN 1988 Aleksey Alekseyevich Levchenko Rostov-on-Don Anti-war protest   Rostov-on-Don   06/03/2022 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO detention for 5 days Rostov Regional Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 06/03/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     37779/22* 21/07/2022 Nikita Aleksandrovich BELYAKOV 1997 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   02/04/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days St   Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/04/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     39789/22 05/08/2022 Violetta Albertovna GUASARI 1994 Yekaterina Viktorovna Dadayeva St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   02/04/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 3 days St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/04/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three ‑ hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based.     47969/22* 15/09/2022 Andrey Yuryevich ARKHIPOV 1990     Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 09/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 06/03/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.   48020/22* 15/09/2022 Aleksey Anatolyevich AGAFONOV 1959     Anti-war protest   Moscow   13/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 19/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 13/03/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based,   Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - various deficiencies of the administrative offence proceedings (no possibility to adduce evidence).   48510/22 29/09/2022 Marina Yevgenyevna ZAMYATINA 1999 Yekaterina Viktorovna Dadayeva St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   02/04/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 80 hours of community service St Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/04/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based   48752/22* 13/09/2022 Yegor Sergeyevich KULIKOV 2001     Anti-war protest   Moscow   13/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 13/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 13/03/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three ‑ hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based