CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 novembre 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-229886
- Date
- 30 novembre 2023
- Publication
- 30 novembre 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } Published on 8 January 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   2388/18 Roza Fanurovna BATUSOVA against Russia and 12 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 30 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     2388/18 21/12/2017 Roza Fanurovna BATUSOVA 1969     community service, 100 hours 14/08/2017 Vyborg Town Court o f the Leningrad Region       10864/18* 26/02/2018 Nikita Vladimirovich MISUNOV 1980 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow fine of RUB 10,000 30/08/2017 Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 26/03/2017 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period.     11890/18* 15/02/2018 Aleksey Petrovich NOVIKOV 1966     suspension of the driving licence for 1 year and 8 months, fine of RUB 30,000 29/08/2017 Chaykovskiy Town Court of the Perm Region       12297/19* 23/01/2019 Sergey Igorevich BUZIN 1989 Yevgeniy Valeryevich Kulakov Arkhangelsk fine of RUB 30,000 28/12/2018 Solombalskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk       17891/19* 19/03/2019 Vladimir Andriyanovich OLEKHOV 1955 Yevgeniy Valeryevich Kulakov Arkhangelsk detention for 7 days 15/02/2019 Lomonosovskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk       36152/19* 25/06/2019 Vasiliy Sergeyevich SAYANTS 1999     fine of RUB 30,000 14/02/2019 Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to police office on 05/05/2018 for compiling an offence report.     55054/19* 13/10/2019 Nikolay Aleksandrovich ZHALNIN 1984     suspension of the driving licence for 1 year and 8 months, fine of RUB 30,000 18/07/2019 Nikolskiy District Court of the Penza Region       55090/21* 22/10/2021 Anna Aleksandrovna TRIBULKINA 1989 Yaroslav Vladimirovich Bocharov Bryansk fine of RUB 10,000 02/09/2021 Bryansk Regional Court       18013/22* 10/03/2022 Andrey Viktorovich LASKAVYY 1980     fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence, for 1 year and 6 months 06/12/2021 Kuzminskiy District Court of Moscow     18438/22 18/03/2022 Yuriy Viktorovich STRELCHENKO 1967 Aleksandr Nikolayevich Girenkov Aleysk suspension of the driving licence, for 18 months,   fine of RUB 30,000 09/03/2022 Aleysk Town Court of the Altay Region     23625/22* 28/03/2022 Asker Askerovich GEYDAROV 1973 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow detention for 3 days 17/12/2021 Moscow City Court Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 17/09/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   26675/22* 05/05/2022 Semen Yuryevich SAVVATEYEV 1999     fine of RUB 30, 000, suspension of the driving licence for 2 years 08/11/2021 Blagoveschenskiy District Court of the Amur Region     30211/22* 28/05/2022 Igor Vladimirovich PAVLOV 1991 Valeriy Viktorovich Kanayev Diveyevo suspension of the driving licence for 1 year and 6 months 20/04/2022 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court Art. 6 (3) (c) - own choice of legal assistance - failure to postpone the first hearing in the view of the representative’s COVID infection, as a result, the applicant was not represented and failed to question prosecuting witnesses in open court        Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 30 novembre 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-229886
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel