CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 décembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 8 January 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no. 56411/15 ARGINERT SH.P.K. TIRANE against Albania lodged on 10 November 2015 communicated on 15 December 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant company’s right of access to the Constitutional Court because its constitutional complaint was declared inadmissible as being lodged out of time. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the Constitutional Court’s decision, rejecting the applicant company’s constitutional complaint as being lodged out of time, violate the applicant company’s right of access to a court as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Shuli v. Greece , no. 71891/10, §§ 24-27, 13 July 2017; Frida, LLC v. Ukraine , no. 24003/07, §§ 32-39, 8 December 2016; and Dumitru Gheorghe v. Romania , no. 33883/06, §§ 25-28, 12   April 2016)?   The Government are invited to submit the case file of the Constitutional Court.