CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } Published on 5 February 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no.   13644/21 Aleksandr Vladimirovich GRESKO against Russia and 5 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     13644/21 12/02/2021 Aleksandr Vladimirovich GRESKO 1974   Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg detention for 10   days 28/01/2021 Sverdlovsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Yekaterinburg, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision 28/01/2021 by the Sverdlovsk Regional Court,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     26374/21 08/05/2021 Zakhar Borisovich SARAPULOV 1992   Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia detention for 10   days 02/02/2021 Irkutsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Irkutsk, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision on 02/02/2021 by the Irkutsk Regional Court.     33618/21 04/06/2021 Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich VOROBEY 2001   Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia detention for 10   days 29/04/2021 Irkutsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Irkutsk, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision by the Irkutsk Regional Court on 29/04/2021.     38156/21* 13/07/2021 Vadim Arkadyevich ANANYIN 1972   Inna Viktorovna Kosheleva Kirov detention for 4   days,     fine of RUB   5,000,     detention for 5   days 16/03/2021 Kirov Regional Court   01/03/2021 Kirov Regional Court   18/01/2022 Kirov Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Kirov, Article 20.2 § 2 CAO, final decision 16/03/2021, Kirov Regional Court;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (conviction on 04/02/2021, appeal on 16/03/2021 and conviction on 14/01/2022, appeal on 18/01/2022),   Art. 11 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of peaceful assembly - disproportionate interference with his freedom of assembly on account of his conviction under Art. 20.2 § 1 CAO for having organised and participated on 29/10/2020 in Kirov in a rally in support of victims of political repressions, fine of RUB 5,000, final decision Kirov Regional Court 01/03/2021,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 14/01/2022 and detention beyond the three-hour statutory period.   Art. 6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (final decision Kirov Regional Court 18/01/2022),   Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators – solo picket against torture in the Russian penitentiary system on 06/01/2022 in Kirov, Art. 20.2 § 8 CAO, detention for 5 days, final decision Kirov Regional Court 18/01/2022.     40950/21 28/07/2021 Dmitriy Olegovich NADEIN 1974   Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia detention for 10 days 24/02/2021 Irkutsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – making calls to take part in an unauthorised manifestation in Irkutsk on 23/01/20201, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision by the Irkutsk Regional Court on 24/02/2021     3804/22* 15/12/2021 Yekaterina Aleksandrovna ASTAFYEVA 1991   Daniil Alekseyevich Polyakov Voronezh fine of RUB 20,000,     fine of RUB 20,000 15/06/2021 Voronezh Regional Court   22/06/2021 Voronezh Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - in two unrelated sets of administrative-offence proceedings the applicant was convicted for calls to participate in rallies to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 in Voronezh, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fines of RUB 20,000, final decisions 15/06/2021 and 22/06/2021 Voronezh Regional Court.