CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 5 February 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no.   39000/18 Anton Viktorovich STRUNIN against Russia and 13 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     39000/18* 01/08/2018 Anton Viktorovich STRUNIN 1982     fine of RUB   1,000 12/03/2018 Oktyabrskiy District Court of Penza Art. 10 (1) - conviction for the display of slogans/banners/other symbols by participants in public events - In three separate sets of administrative offence proceedings the applicant was convicted for distributing leaflets about forthcoming anti-government manifestations, fine RUB 1,000 in each set of the proceedings, Article 5.12 § 1 of CAO, final decisions: Zheleznodorozhniy District Court of Penza 02/02/2018, Oktyabrskiy District Court of Penza 12/03/2018, Leninskiy District Court of Penza 15/03/2019.     13606/21 12/02/2021 Kristina Salakhovna ALTSHULER 1989 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg fine of RUB   20,000 03/11/2020 Sverdlovsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a manifestation on 01/08/2020 in Yekaterinburg, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision 03/11/2020, Sverdlovsk Regional Court     20524/21 29/03/2021 Sergey Vladimirovich TOLMACHEV 1979 Andrey Gennadyevich Lepekhin Chelyabinsk fine of RUB   25,000 30/09/2020 Chelyabinsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a manifestation in Chelyabinsk on 25/07/2020, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB   25,000, final decision 30/09/2020, Chelyabinsk Regional Court     24232/21* 19/04/2021 Andrey Sergeyevich PROKUDIN 1990 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius detention for   10 days,     detention for 4   days,     fine of RUB   160,000 28/01/2021, Tver Regional Court   23/04/2021, Tver Regional Court   30/06/2021 Tver Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Tver, Article 20.2 § 2 CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision Tver Regional Court, 28/01/2021,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period (complaint lodged on 19/04/2021); (2) escorting to the police station on 19/04/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period (complaint lodged on 15/10/2021).     29002/21 11/05/2021 Pavel Valeryevich CHERNUKHIN 1978 Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia detention for 10 days 28/04/2021 Irkutsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a rally in support of A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Irkutsk, Article 20.2. § 2 of CAO, detention of 10 days, 28/04/2021 Irkutsk Regional Court:     41318/21* 05/08/2021 Anton Maksimovich TALYKOV 1998 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius detention for 10 days,     detention for 10 days 09/02/2021 Kurgan Regional Court   09/02/2021 Kurgan Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - two convictions for calls to take part in rallies to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 in Kurgan, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, each time the applicant was sentenced to detention for 10 days, final decisions on 09/02/2021 by the Kurgan Regional Court (in both sets of proceedings).     45365/21* 24/08/2021 Olga Yuryevna KOMLEVA 1979 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow fine of RUB   30, 000,       fine of RUB   25, 000,       fine of RUB   150, 000 24/02/2021 Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic   24/02/2021 Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic   17/05/2021 Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - disproportionate interference with her freedom of expression on account of her convictions under Art. 20.2 § 2 CAO for publishing (1) on 26/01/2021 on her Facebook page a call to participate in a rally "Free Navalnyy" on 31/01/2021 in Ufa, final decision 24/02/2021 by the Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic; (2) on 21/01/2021 on her Facebook page a call to participate in a rally "Free Navalnyy" on 23/01/2021 in Ufa, final decision on 24/02/2021 by the Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic     60774/21* 07/12/2021 Vladislav Andreyevich OSIPOV 1996 Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova Moscow detention for 5   days 09/06/2021 Voronezh Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression – calls to participate in a rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Voronezh, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 5 days, final decision by the Voronezh Regional Court on 09/06/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     3655/22* 30/12/2021 Olga Vladimirovna BELOVA 1974 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius fine of RUB   20,000 06/07/2021 Omsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Omsk, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision Omsk Regional Court 06/07/2021   7996/22* 14/01/2022 Roman Aleksandrovich PISHCHALNIKOV 1990 Aleksandr Vasilyevich Popkov Sochi detention for 10 days 18/08/2021 Krasnodar Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Sochi, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision - Krasnodar Regional Court, 18/08/2021,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   11784/22* 31/01/2022 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich SPIRIN 1975 Yeva Viktorovna Levenberg Moscow fine of RUB   25,000 25/10/2021, Moscow City Court Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression – calls to participate in a rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Moscow, Article 20.2 § 2 CAO, fine of RUB 25,000, final decision 25/10/2021, Moscow City Court   35314/22 01/07/2022 Aleksandr Yuryevich LEBEDEV 1965 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow fine of RUB   20,000 24/01/2022 Saratov Regional Court Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – calls to participate in a manifestation in support of local business on 22/10/2021 in Saratov, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision Saratov Regional Court 24/01/2022.   54423/22* 08/11/2022 Ruslan Aleksandrovich BOROVSKIY 1983 Damir Ravilevich Gaynutdinov Kazan detention for 10 days 08/07/2022 Moscow City Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for the display of slogans/banners/other symbols by participants in public events - public display of symbols of Navalnyy’s organisation, Article 20.3 § 1 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision on 08/07/2022 by the Moscow City Court,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his 10 days’ sentence right after the judgment of the first-instance court and even before his appeal was examined by the Moscow City Court.   56631/22 27/11/2022 Marat Viktorovich NIKITIN 1975 Stanislav Aleksandrovich Seleznev Samara fine of RUB   1,000 04/08/2022, Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - On 21/08/2020 the applicant posted a photo of A. Navalnyy with a FBK sign on it, conviction to a fine of RUB 1,000, Article 20.3 § 1 of the CAO, final decision by the Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic on 04/08/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based