CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 5 February 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no.   41895/22 Yevgeniy Yuryevich ANASHKIN against Russia and 12 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     41895/22 05/08/2022 Yevgeniy Yuryevich ANASHKIN 1992 Nikifor Yuryevich Ivanov St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO detention for 5   days St   Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.55 p.m. on 24/02/2022 p.m. to the evening of 25/02/2022, until court hearing, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 05/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     41903/22 05/08/2022 Andrey Aleksandrovich MARKUNAS 1996 Nikifor Yuryevich Ivanov St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   02/03/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 10   days St   Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.40 p.m. on 02/03/2022 p.m. to 03/02/2022, until court hearing, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 07/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     43467/22 26/08/2022 Nataliya Sergeyevna LEKO 2000 Ilya Valeryevich Tkachenko Kogalym Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 28/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 11.33 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 3.55 p.m. on 25/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 28/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     46757/22 14/09/2022 Andrey Viktorovich KONONOV 1998 Yekaterina Viktorovna Gerasimova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 9.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 3.29 a.m. on 28/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 31/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     46758/22 14/09/2022 Nikolay Andreyevich MOZGOVYKH 1998 Yekaterina Viktorovna Gerasimova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 9.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 p.m. to 5.43 a.m. on 28/02/2022 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 31/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     46759/22 14/09/2022 Zlata Petrovna YEGOROVA 2002 Yekaterina Viktorovna Gerasimova St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 9.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 8.40 a.m. on 28/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 31/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     46854/22 16/09/2022 Yekaterina Andreyevna MIKHAYLENKO 1990 Daniil Aleksandrovich Semenov St   Petersburg Anti-war protest   St   Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2. §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St   Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.55 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 12 p.m. on 25/02/2022, until court hearing, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 17/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     46957/22* 16/09/2022 Yelizaveta Sergeyevna USTINOVA 1996 Yuliya Mikhaylovna Tregubova Balashikha Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000 Moscow City Court 03/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.50 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 3.30 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 03/08/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     46960/22* 16/09/2022 Varvara Dmitriyevna MAKAROVA 2003 Yuliya Mikhaylovna Tregubova Balashikha Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000 Moscow City Court 21/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 10 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 6.50 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   46963/22* 16/09/2022 Nika Maksimovna BOBINA 2001 Yuliya Mikhaylovna Tregubova Balashikha Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 15/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 10 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 5.30 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 15/07/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   46966/22* 16/09/2022 Polina Ivanovna ANTIPOVA 1997 Yuliya Mikhaylovna Tregubova Balashikha Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 23/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on from 8.50 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 3.05 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 23/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   46967/22* 16/09/2022 Mikhail Aleksandrovich ROSSIUS 1973 Yuliya Mikhaylovna Tregubova Balashikha Anti-war protest   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 25/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 5.33 p.m. on 26/02/2022 to 12 a.m. on 27/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/07/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   47138/22 15/09/2022 Olga Alekseyevna LYUBOVTSEVA 2000 Sergey Sergeyevich Kulikov Nizhniy Novgorod Anti-war protest   Nizhniy Novgorod   06/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 06/02/2022 to 2.30 p.m. on 07/02/2022, until court hearing, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and adduce evidence