CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 5 February 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no.   46350/22 Stanislav Sergeyevich SPIRKIN against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     46350/22 07/09/2022 Stanislav Sergeyevich SPIRKIN 1992 Aleksey Sergeyevich Lapuzin Samara Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Samara   27/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Samara Regional Court 12/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report on 27/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     47904/22* 25/09/2022 Yana Anatolyevna LUCHINA 1999 Nikolay Vladimirovich Munskiy Krasnoyarsk Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Krasnoyarsk   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 25/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     47909/22* 25/09/2022 Yegor Viktorovich GOGULAYEV 1997 Nikolay Vladimirovich Munskiy Krasnoyarsk Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Krasnoyarsk   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 25/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     49711/22 01/10/2022 Olga Aleksandrovna MINAKOVA 1986 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Yekaterinburg   02/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Sverdlovsk Regional Court 21/07/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station after compiling an offence report on 02/03/2022.     49796/22 15/09/2022 Andrey Aleksandrovich SHABANOV 1980 Aleksey Sergeyevich Lapuzin Samara Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Samara   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Samara Regional Court 19/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022 between 3.30 p.m. and 10.00 p.m.,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     30852/23* 09/07/2023 Aleksey Anatolyevich LARIONOV 1972     Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Moscow   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 23/03/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report on 06/-07/03/2022.     30856/23* 26/07/2023 Eva Igorevna BOBROVA 2002     Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Moscow   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 29/03/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report on 06-07/03/2022.     38849/23* 30/09/2023 Pavel Ilyich LITVINENKO 1996     Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Moscow   09/05/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 31/05/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 09/05/2022.     39305/23 15/09/2022 Olga Sergeyevna GLYBOCHKO 1996 Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Moscow   27/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 11/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 27 and 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   40154/23 27/10/2023 Dmitriy Georgiyevich DANILOV 1998 Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)   Moscow   27/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 27/06/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report between 6.00   p.m. and 10.50 p.m. on 27/02/2022.