CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 5 February 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no.   21359/20 Yuriy Ivanovich POLYAKOV against Russia and 8 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     21359/20* 28/04/2020 Yuriy Ivanovich POLYAKOV 1952 Yevgeniy Vladislavovich Sokolov Belgorod Political rally   Belgorod   17/08/2019 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 20 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 16/03/2020 Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - Belgorod administration’s refusals to approve the locations and dates of several political public events planned by the applicant in Belgorod (final decisions taken by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation): (1) on 13/12/2019 - proposal to change the location because another public event has already been planned; final decision 22/06/2020; (2) on 30/03/2020 - proposal to change the location because another public event has already been planned, regional ban on holding public events in view of COVID-19 restrictions; final decision 15/10/2020; (3) on 08/09/2020 - regional ban on holding public events in view of COVID-19 restrictions; final decision 15/03/2021; (4) on 18/09/2020 - regional ban on holding public events in view of COVID-19 restrictions; final decision 22/03/2021; (5) on 22/09/2020 - regional ban on holding public events in view of COVID-19 restrictions; final decision 24/03/2021; (6) on 09/11/2020 - regional ban on holding public events in view of COVID-19 restrictions; final decision 27/04/2021.     20261/21 26/03/2021 Sergey Aleksandrovich BANKO 1985 Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia Political rally   Irkutsk   22/08/2020   Political rally   Irkutsk   05/09/2020 article 20.2 § 1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000         fine of RUB   15,000 Irkutsk Regional Court 26/11/2020       Irkutsk Regional Court 21/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - political rally on 22/08/2020 in Irkutsk, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB   30,000, final decision Irkutsk Regional Court 26/11/2020.     45609/21 31/08/2021 Anton Igorevich OBROSOV 1989 Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Blagoveshchensk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000     fine of RUB   2,000 Amur Regional Court 12/03/2021   Amur Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 20.6.1 §   1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO).     28681/22 22/05/2022 Dmitriy Viktorovich SEVERINOV 1985 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Voronezh   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 23/11/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     35395/22* 05/07/2022 Stanislav Igorevich MANION 1985 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   Yekaterinburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 29 days Sverdlovsk Regional Court 16/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 9.15 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     44625/22 26/08/2022 Stanislav Sergeyevich SPIRKIN 1992 Aleksey Sergeyevich Lapuzin Samara Anti-war protest   Samara   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Samara Regional Court 12/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     48489/22* 16/09/2022 Nikita Nikolayevich SOROKIN 2000     Anti-war protest   Voronezh   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 17/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     49516/22* 30/09/2022 Igor Vladimirovich PUSHKAR 1962 Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg Anti-war protest   Omsk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Omsk Regional Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station, detention for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     52432/22 27/10/2022 Nikita Sergeyevich DEMENTYEV 2000 Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   13/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St   Petersburg City Court 28/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 13/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.