CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-231511
- Date
- 7 février 2024
- Publication
- 7 février 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sEAE3FFDB { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sF9195E13 { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s295DC12A { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super } .s3B53EBCF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; font-size:2pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } Published on 26 February 2024 THIRD SECTION Application no. 8026/19 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others against Bulgaria and 9 other applications (see appended list) communicated on 7 February 2024   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.     These ten applications concern ten successive refusals of the Bulgarian Registry Agency, dating from the period between June 2018 and February 2023, to enter the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden (“Ilinden”) – or, in four of the applications, Ilinden’s chapters in Blagoevgrad and Plovdiv – in the register of non-profit organisations kept by that Agency. By section   6(1) of the Bulgarian Non-Profit Legal Persons Act 2000, such registration is a prerequisite for a non-profit organisation to acquire legal personality. 2.     Ilinden advocates the view that there exists an oppressed Macedonian minority in Bulgaria and seeks to protect its rights. 3.     Ilinden’s successive chairpersons (respectively the chairpersons of its chapters) sought judicial review of each of the ten refusals, but the competent courts upheld all of them. In eight cases the final court of appeal was the Sofia Court of Appeal, and in two cases it was the Plovdiv Court of Appeal. In some cases, those courts pointed to formal deficiencies in Ilinden’s registration documents. In other cases, they stated that Ilinden’s aims, as set out in its articles of association, implied that there existed an oppressed Macedonian ethnic minority in Bulgaria, and held that the creation of an association having such aims was directed against the unity of the nation and was meant to stir up ethnic hatred, contrary to the prohibition in Article 44 § 2 of the Bulgarian Constitution. In one case, the Plovdiv Court of Appeal held that Ilinden’s aims, as set out in its articles of association, were political, and that it hence had to seek registration as a political party rather than an association – since by Article 12 § 2 of the Constitution associations could not pursue political aims or carry out political activities. In another case, the Sofia Court of Appeal held that since Ilinden’s stated aims and activities were directed towards an undefined category of people, it could not obtain registration as an association in private interest but had to seek registration as an association in public interest instead. 4.     In each of the ten applications, Ilinden, its successive chairpersons (respectively the chairpersons of its chapters), and, in one case, members of its managing board complain under Article 11 of the Convention of the respective refusals to register Ilinden. 5.     In eight applications (nos. 15845/21, 47911/21, 29253/22, 57686/22, 57690/22, 23329/23, 34534/23 and 39017/23), they also complain under Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 11 of the Convention that those refusals were motivated – some implicitly and some overtly – by the Macedonian ethnic identity of Ilinden’s founders. 6.     In one application (no. 40644/23), they further complain under Article   18 of the Convention that the real reason for the one of the refusals to register Ilinden – which was in that case based on its failure to seek registration as an association in public interest – was to deny the Macedonian ethnic identity of its founders. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a breach of the applicants’ right to freedom of association, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention? In particular, were the ten refusals to register Ilinden “prescribed by law” and “necessary in a democratic society” for the attainment of one or more of the aims set out in Article 11 § 2, in the light of, in particular, the reasons given to uphold those refusals by the final courts of appeal hearing the legal challenges against them   – the Sofia Court of Appeal in eight of the cases and the Plovdiv Court of Appeal in two of the cases (see, mutatis mutandis,   United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2) , nos. 41561/07 and 20972/08, § 80, 18 October 2011)? 2.     Did the refusal to register Ilinden at issue in application no. 40644/23 pursue a purpose other than those envisaged by Article 11 of the Convention, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention? APPENDIX No. App. no. Case name Lodged on Applicant and year of birth (where applicable) Represented by 1. 8026/19 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v.   Bulgaria 31 January 2019 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden Mr Yordan Kostadinov IVANOV, 1932 [1] Mr Kiril Tomov KULALIEV, 1946 Mr Dimitar Zaprev PARASKOV, 1954 Mr K. Kanev 2. 15845/21 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Paraskov v.   Bulgaria 12 March 2021 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden Mr Dimitar Zaprev PARASKOV, 1954 Mr K. Kanev 3. 47911/21 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Paraskov v.   Bulgaria 1 September 2021 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden Mr Dimitar Zaprev PARASKOV, 1954 Mr K. Kanev 4. 29253/22 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Paraskov v.   Bulgaria 9 June 2022 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden Mr Dimitar Zaprev PARASKOV, 1954 Mr K. Kanev 5. 57686/22 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Blagoevgrad and Kiril Ivanov v. Bulgaria 9 December 2022 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Blagoevgrad Mr Kiril Kostadinov IVANOV, 1942 Mr K. Kanev 6. 57690/22 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Tilev v.   Bulgaria 14 December 2022 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden Mr Kiril Serafimov TILEV, 1951 [2] Mr K. Kanev 7. 23329/23 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Plovdiv and Bozhinov v. Bulgaria 29 May 2023 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Plovdiv Mr Borislav Atanasov BOZHINOV, 1954 Mr K. Kanev 8. 34534/23 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Blagoevgrad and Kiril Ivanov v. Bulgaria 7 September 2023 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Blagoevgrad Mr Kiril Kostadinov IVANOV, 1942 Mr K. Kanev 9. 39017/23 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Plovdiv and Bozhinov v. Bulgaria 23 October 2023 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-Plovdiv Mr Borislav Atanasov BOZHINOV, 1954 Mr K. Kanev 10. 40644/23 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Tilev v.   Bulgaria 9 November 2023 United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden Mr Kiril Serafimov TILEV, 1951 2 Mr K. Kanev   [1]     Mr Yordan Ivanov died on 23 August 2019. [2]     Mr Tilev says that he is a national of both Bulgaria and North Macedonia.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 7 février 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-231511
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel