CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 1 février 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sCBDF263B { height:29.9pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s2706B248 { height:126.8pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sA2B60CE4 { height:104.35pt } Published on 11 March 2024   THIRD SECTION Applications nos.   15085/19 and 17661/22 Lyubov Eduardovna SOBOL and Others against Russia (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 15 February 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, 7   February 2017).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Location Date of the public event planned Restrictions applied Final domestic decision (type of procedure) Date Name of the court     15085/19* 06/03/2019 Lyubov Eduardovna SOBOL 1987 Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich Zamyatin Berlin Meeting with A. Navalnyy, prospekt Sakharova, Moscow   14/10/2017   Meeting with A. Navalnyy, prospekt Sakharova, Moscow   21/10/2017   Meeting with A. Navalnyy, prospekt Sakharova, Moscow   26/11/2017 proposal to change the location       proposal to change the location       proposal to change the location Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 12/09/2018       Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 11/09/2018       Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 11/09/2018     17661/22* 16/03/2022 Viktor Borisovich SOROKIN 1969   Arkadiy Yuryevich BULATOV 1980   Mikhail Viktorovich KONDRYUKOV 1975       Several public events planned in Novosibirsk, between 18/02/2021 and 23/02/2021 prohibition on holding the planned public assembly; regional ban on holding public events in view of COVID-19 restrictions Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 13/05/2022