CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 mai 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 10 June 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   22832/18 Sergey Vladislavovich DOMASHNEV against Russia and 4 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 16 May 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth / registration Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     22832/18* 08/05/2018 Sergey Vladislavovich DOMASHNEV 1966 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow fine of RUB   15,000 06/02/2018.   Moscow City Court Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the open court the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; raised on appeal.     35602/18* 24/07/2018 Yevgeniy Valeryevich DOMOZHIROV 1974 Konstantin Aleksandrovich Markin Velikiy Novgorod fines of RUB   1,000 and RUB   2,000,   administrative detention of 3   days (event of 27/04/2020) and 20   days (event of 20/04/2021) 06/07/2020, 12/10/2020, 19/10/2020, 02/09/2020, 22/04/2021   Vologda Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station on 27-28/04/2020 (relevant complaint lodged on 05/01/2021, final decision issued on 06/07/2020) and on 06/07/2020 between 10.49 a.m. and 1.00   p.m. (relevant complaint lodged on 28/02/2021, final decision issued on 02/09/2020) and on 20-21/04/2021,   Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - on account of his convictions (1) on 26/01/2018 under Art.   319of the Criminal Code for having publicly insulted a police officer, sentence: 60   hours of community works ( Savva Terentiyev v. Russia , no. 10692/09, 28   August 2018); (2) on 22/04/2021 under Art.   20.2 § 8 CAO for having published calls on social media for participation in a rally "Free Navalnyy" in Vologda on 21/04/2021; other restrictions, including on account of his repeated convictions for breaking self-isolation rules and thus preventing him from collecting and publishing information on issues of public interest (construction of a kindergarten in a park).     44832/19* 12/08/2019 Maksim Sergeyevich TRETYAKOV 1985 Anatoliy Mariyevich Svechnikov Yekaterinburg fine of RUB   10,000 12/02/2019,   Sverdlovsk Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the statutory three-hour period.     56790/21* 22/10/2021 Arkadiy Vladimirovich KOCHKUNOV 1978 Anastasiya Vladimirovna Kopteyeva Chita detention for 20   days 21/04/2021   Zabaykalskiy Regional Court   (decision served to the applicant on the following day) Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - disproportionate interference with his freedom of expression on account of his conviction under Art. 20.2 § 8 CAO for having published on 20/04/2021 on social media a call for the participation in the rally "Free Navalnyy" on 21/04/2021,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - Right of appeal against criminal conviction/sentence - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     20229/22 29/03/2022 PARTIYA NARODNOY SVOBODY 2016   Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg administrative fine of RUB   70,000 29/09/2021   Kirov Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - conviction under Art. 20.2 § 2 CAO for having published on 23/01/2021 a call in the social network "VKontakte" to participate in a rally in support of Mr.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021.