CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 mai 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 3 June 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 44804/22 Vesna OMERAGIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged on 14 September 2022 communicated on 17 May 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the non-enforcement of a final decision of 18   November 2011 by which the applicant was entitled, under section 56 of the Privatisation of Flats Act of 2007 (“the Act”), to be allocated a suitable flat in lieu of a flat in respect of which she had occupancy right and which had been destroyed during the 1992-95 war in the respondent State. The applicant’s enforcement request was rejected on account of lack of available housing units in the Bosanski Brod Municipality. On 26 October 2016 and 8   June 2022 (served on the applicant on 20 June 2022), the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeals as manifestly ill-founded. In the meantime in 2020, the time-limit for the allocation of replacement flats set in the Act, was extended to 30 June 2025. Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant complains about the non-enforcement of the final decision in her favour. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and/or Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the non-enforcement of the final decision of the Bosanski Brod Municipality of 18   November 2011 in the applicant’s favour ( see Đukić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no. 4543/09, 19   June 2012; Milisavljević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no. 7435/04, 3 March 2009; and Giza v. Poland , no. 48242/06, 13 July 2010)?