CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 mai 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-234572
- Date
- 27 mai 2024
- Publication
- 27 mai 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .sEA6F756B { height:55.85pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s28C364EC { height:70.1pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAB604627 { height:69.6pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 17 June 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no. 24309/22 Nazlı ÇELİKMAKAS against Türkiye and 9 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 27 May 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE All the applications listed below (see appendix) concern the criminal conviction of the applicants to prison sentences combined with a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment on charges of insulting a public official, insulting the President of the Republic, insulting publicly the memory of Atatürk, publicly denigrating religious beliefs of a section of the public and praising an offence and offender for their acts and statements allegedly relating to the use by them of their freedom of expression. Relying on Article 10 of the Convention, all the applicants complained that their convictions and the subsequent application of a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment violated their freedom of expression. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, within the meaning of Article   10 §   1 of the Convention, due to their conviction to prison sentences combined with a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article   10 §   2? Was the measure of the suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment imposed on the applicants prescribed by a legal basis defining the scope and modalities of this measure with sufficient clarity to enable the applicants to enjoy the degree of protection required by the rule of law in a democratic society ( Durukan and Birol v. Türkiye , nos. 14879/20 and 13440/21, §§   58 ‑ 68, 3 October 2023)?       APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by Criminal charges 1. 24309/22 Çelikmakas v. Türkiye 20/04/2022 Nazlı ÇELİKMAKAS 1987 İstanbul Turkish Sevgi KALAN GÜVERCİN Insulting a public official 2. 51636/22 Kaya v. Türkiye 17/10/2022 Murat KAYA 1986 Erzincan Turkish Sezai DEMİRBİLEK publicly denigrating religious beliefs of a section of the public 3. 54984/22 Kanlısu v. Türkiye 14/11/2022 Kayra KANLISU 2003 İzmir Turkish Murat AYDIN Insulting the President of the Republic 4. 11016/23 Malatyalı v. Türkiye 17/02/2023 Cansel MALATYALI 1969 Aydın Turkish Zafer İNCİN Insulting the President of the Republic   Insulting a public official 5. 12523/23 Erkul v. Türkiye 06/03/2023 Hatice ERKUL 1980 İstanbul Turkish Kerami ÖZDEMİR Insulting publicly the memory of Atatürk 6. 13346/23 Arslan v. Türkiye 07/03/2023 Ayşe ARSLAN 1988 İzmir Turkish Türkan ASLAN AĞAÇ Insulting the President of the Republic   7. 13603/23 Aksu v. Türkiye 08/03/2023 Turhan AKSU 1971 İstanbul Turkish Yusuf Kenan ALTAN Insulting the President of the Republic   8. 13604/23 Kaplan v. Türkiye 06/03/2023 Salih KAPLAN 1999 Şanlıurfa Turkish Mehmet BARAN Praising an offence and offender 9. 18925/23 Yılmazarslan v. Türkiye 25/04/2023 Nilgün Aysel YILMAZARSLAN 1995 Ankara Turkish Doğukan Tonguç CANKURT Insulting a public official 10. 27745/23 Zeyrek v. Türkiye 05/07/2023 Yasemin ZEYREK 1994 Adana Turkish Sevil ARACI Insulting the President of the Republic      Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 27 mai 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-234572
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel