CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 13 juin 2024

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s9B8A0E71 { padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:11.35pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E49B105 { background-color:#ffffff } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)128 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 26 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 June 2024 at the 1501 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 25633/18 KORNILOV 06/10/2022 06/10/2022 23534/20 GORBUNENKO 06/10/2022 06/10/2022 57967/15 LUKASH AND MAGDALITS 29/09/2022 29/09/2022 988/13 KOLESNIKOV 20/09/2022 20/09/2022 11623/13 SERDYUKOV 20/09/2022 20/09/2022 54014/13 BABICH 20/09/2022 20/09/2022 13911/14 MOLCHANOV 20/09/2022 20/09/2022 21702/14 KADUSHKEVYCH 20/09/2022 20/09/2022 24178/14 BARTKOVA AND VORONIN 10/02/2022 10/02/2022 17573/14 GRESS 20/01/2022 20/01/2022 54337/19 YEGOROV AND OTHERS 08/07/2021 08/07/2021 13399/19 ZOLOTARYOV 01/04/2021 01/04/2021 34900/08 NAKONECHNYY AND OTHERS 11/01/2018 11/01/2018 49701/12 MOYSEYETS AND OTHERS 05/10/2023 05/10/2023 33688/17 PSHIK AND SHYSHENKO 05/10/2023 05/10/2023 18444/18 TROFYMENKO 04/05/2023 04/05/2023 71105/14 TSEKHANOVYCH AND OTHERS 13/04/2023 13/04/2023 5765/20 OLEKSEYCHUK 15/12/2022 15/12/2022 68678/17 SIDAK 10/11/2022 10/11/2022 74633/17 SURZHAN AND GULYY 27/10/2022 27/10/2022 40232/19 DYSHUK AND OTHERS 02/03/2023 02/03/2023 69195/17 MARTYNCHUK AND OTHERS 01/12/2022 01/12/2022 64627/13 OKSANICH 20/01/2022 20/01/2022 15360/10 NECHAY 01/07/2021 01/10/2021 44704/11 POPOVYCH 22/04/2021 22/07/2021 9333/20 KONDRATENKO 20/05/2021 20/05/2021   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of unlawful and excessive length of detention on remand as well as the lack of judicial review compatible with the standards laid down in the Court’s case-law and an enforceable right to compensation (violations of Articles 5, paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action plans provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to execute the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2024)384 and DH-DD(2024)127 );   Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants are no longer in detention on remand;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments, continues to be examined within the framework of the Ignatov group of cases, also in the light of the Court’s findings in these cases, and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation t o the application of detention on remand under the 2012 Code of Criminal Procedure;   Noting that questions related to excessive length of criminal proceedings, raised by the Gorbunenko , Yegorov and Others , Nakonechnyy and Others , Dyshuk and Others and Nechay cases, are being examined by the Committee in the context of the supervision of the Merit group of cases;   Noting that questions related to delayed release from detention, raised by the Dyshuk and Others case, are being examined by the Committee in the context of the supervision of the Oshurko group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases;   CONCLUDES that the necessary individual measures have been adopted;   DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures concerning the application of detention on remand under the 2012 Code of Criminal Procedure in the context of the Ignatov group of cases;   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.