CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 13 juin 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 8 July 2024   THIRD SECTION   Application no.   6607/20 Oleg Olegovich STEPANOV against Russia and 8 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 13 June 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     6607/20* 27/12/2019 Oleg Olegovich STEPANOV 1992   Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow   16/07/2019 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 15 days Moscow City Court 06/08/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 01/08/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections - the applicant could not stand for elections as the former head of the Navalnyy’s headquarters in Moscow, i.e., organisation designated as “extremist” by the authorities.     15806/21* 08/03/2021 Dmitriy Vladimirovich ZHMYREV 1989   Irina Aleksandrovna Yatsenko Moscow Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow   27/07/2019 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 08/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report between 4.40 p.m. on 27/07/2019 and 1.30 a.m. on 28/07/2019,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     44110/21* 09/08/2021 Yevgeniy Olegovich GOLIGOROV 1993   Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Karavayev Nizhniy Novgorod Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 Article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     51485/21* 08/10/2021 Dmitriy Pavlovich PAVLOV 2001     Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnodar   31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 21/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     36794/22 12/07/2022 Anton Ivanovich MIROSHNICHENKO 2001   Sergey Aleksandrovich Loktev St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   28/02/2022 Article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at a police station for compiling an offence record between 28/02/2022 and 01/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     50687/22 26/09/2022 Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich GROZIN 1997       Anti-war rally   Kirov   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000   Kirov Regional Court 26/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     2610/23 17/12/2022 Sofya Vyacheslavovna LAVRENTYEVA 1994   Rim Faridovich Sabirov Kazan Anti-war protest   Kazan   27/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 17/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 27/02/2022 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the statutory three-hour period.     10823/24 17/03/2024 Yana Maksimovna PROKHOROVA 2002   Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow   27/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/08/2023   The case file was returned to the District Court on 17/11/2023 (evidence submitted), this is the date the applicant was able to access the text of the City Court’s decision. Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Detention in excess of three hours, between 5.50 p.m. and 9.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022.     10835/24* 28/03/2024 Andrey Mikhaylovich SEVASTYANOV 1984       Anti-war rally   Moscow   04/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 29/11/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Detention in excess of three hours, i.e., between 7.33 p.m. on 04/03/2022 and 00.50 a.m. on 05/03/2022.