CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 29 août 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 16 September 2024   FIRST SECTION Applications nos. 57842/22 and 4722/23 Jahangir ABBAS and Others against Italy and Muhammad Arsalan HAMEED against Italy lodged on 21 December 2022 and 26 January 2023 respectively communicated on 29 August 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ living conditions following their temporary expulsion from a reception centre for asylum seekers (“the CARA”). The applicants were hosted in the Gradisca d’Isonzo CARA. Following various incidents occurred at the CARA on 8 and 9   September 2022, the Prefecture ( Prefettura ) of Gorizia, on 14 and 15   September 2022, ordered their eviction from the CARA premises pursuant to section   23   §   1   (a) of Decree Law no.   142 of 18   August 2015. The applicants therefore brought an action against the administrative decisions before the Regional Administrative Court (“the RAC”) of Friuli Venezia Giulia. With regard to application no.   57842/22 , on 19   October 2022 the RAC ordered the suspension of the effects of the eviction orders. On 10   November 2022, the same RAC quashed the administrative decisions, on the grounds of their inconsistency with the law and awarded each applicant a lump sum of 100   Euros (judgment no. 470/2022). On 14   November 2022, the applicants filed a request for enforcement of the judgment. On 22   December 2022, the applicants lodged with the Court a request for interim measures under Article   39 of the Rules of the Court. On 27   December 2022, the Prefecture of Gorizia ordered that the applicants be relocated in the CARA in compliance with judgment no.   470/2022. With regard to application no. 4722/23 , on 3   November 2022, the RAC issued an analogous order for suspension of the effects of the expulsion order, and on 30   November 2022 quashed the administrative decision (judgment no.   515/2022). On 27   December 2022, the applicant filed a request for enforcement of the judgment. On 26   January 2023, the applicant lodged with the Court a request for interim measures under Article   39 of the Rules of the Court. On 30   January 2023, the Prefecture of Gorizia ordered that the applicant be relocated in the CARA in compliance with judgment no.   515/2022. The applicants complain under Article   3 of the Convention that, since their eviction from the CARA premises and until relocation, they slept in makeshift beds or in abandoned buildings, had no regular access to food, hygienic services and adequate medical assistance. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, was the appeal before the Council of State an effective remedy within the meaning of this provision in respect of the applicants’ complaint under Article 3 of the Convention?   2.     Have the applicants been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention ( M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no.   30696/09, § 235-64, 21 January 2011; N.H. and Others v. France , nos.   28820/13 and 2 others, § 163-4, 2 July 2020)?   APPENDIX List of cases: No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 57842/22 Abbas and Others v. Italy 21/12/2022 J. ABBAS 1994 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani W. AHMED 1993 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani A. AFZAL 1993 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani A. ALI 1991 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani S. MUHAMMAD 1974 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani U. SIBGHAT 1996 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani R. TOQEER 1995 Gradisca d’Isonzo Pakistani Caterina BOVE 2. 4722/23 Hameed v. Italy 26/01/2023 M. HAMEED 1995 Bosaro (Rovigo) Pakistani Caterina BOVE