CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 septembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 30 September 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   10986/24 Svetlana Sergeyevna NEKRASOVA against Russia and 3 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 September 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016   (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law     10986/24 31/03/2024 Svetlana Sergeyevna NEKRASOVA 1989   Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 03/10/2023 (Copy of the appellate decision received at the District Court’s registry on 26/01/2024) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - the police did not indicate reasons for detention such as why the offence report could not be compiled at the scene     13613/24 25/04/2024 Kirill Nikolayevich IGAMBERDIYEV 1987   Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 27/10/2023 (Copy of the appellate decision received at the District Court’s registry on 28/12/2023). Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention -detention in excess of three hours, between 10.00 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 4.20 a.m. on 25/02/2022     14678/24* 15/04/2024 Ruslan Olegovich BEZRUCHENKOV 1995       Anti-war rally   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 15/12/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - detention in excess of three hours, between 5.00 p.m. and 11.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022     14746/24* 12/04/2024 Denis Dmitriyevich SERGEYEV 1998       Anti-war rally   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 13/12/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - detention in excess of three hours, at 6.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 4.30 p.m. on 07/03/2022