CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 9 septembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .sE94AE824 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:28.35pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-28.35pt; text-align:justify } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s7E92E884 { height:86.65pt } Published on 30 September 2024   FIRST SECTION Application no. 19002/20 József ÉBERLING against Hungary and 4 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 9 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ conviction to life imprisonment without the possibility of release on parole and the fact that their mandatory pardon proceedings can take place only after having served forty years. The lists of applicants and the final domestic decisions are set out in the appended table. The applicants complain under Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Have the applicants been deprived of any real prospect of release and thus potentially subjected to inhuman punishment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, in view of the fact that they will not be eligible for the mandatory pardon proceedings before having served forty years of imprisonment (see T.P. and A.T. v. Hungary , nos. 37871/14 and 73986/14, 4 October 2016)?       APPENDIX List of applications   No. Application no.   Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by Final domestic decision 1. 19002/20   24/04/2020 József ÉBERLING 1979 Szeged Hungarian Evelyn FRANK By a final judgment of 28   January 2016, the Szeged Court of Appeal sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment without release on parole for attempted murder. 2. 17090/22   25/03/2022 Béla MÉSZÁROS 1976 Budapest Hungarian Evelyn FRANK By a final judgment of 12   June 2014, the Szeged Court of Appeal sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment without release on parole for murder and other crimes. 3. 18357/22   25/03/2022 Ferenc HANKÓ 1978 Budapest Hungarian Evelyn FRANK By a final judgment of 23   July 2020, the Győr Court of Appeal sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment without release on parole for attempted murder committed on more than one person and violation of personal freedom. 4. 18359/22   25/03/2022 Dragan BAJIC 1973 Budapest Serbian Evelyn FRANK By a final judgment of 4   May 2016, the Budapest Court of Appeal sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment without release on parole for murder and other crimes. 5. 12300/24   18/04/2024 Richárd Attila GÓRÉ 1986 Tiszalök Hungarian Evelyn FRANK By a final judgment of 11   November 2020, the Budapest Court of Appeal sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment without release on parole for attempted murder. The decision was upheld by the Kúria on 16   November 2021.