CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 novembre 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-238626
- Date
- 21 novembre 2024
- Publication
- 21 novembre 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 9 December 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no. 22179/19 Kadriye AKINCI against Türkiye and 6 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 21 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE All the applications listed below (see appendix) concern the searches conducted in the applicants’ houses, offices, vehicles or on their person in the aftermath of the attempted coup of 15 July 2016. The applicants were judges and prosecutors in different jurisdictions at the relevant time. Acting on the instructions of the Ankara public prosecutor’s office, regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices initiated criminal investigations in respect of individuals suspected of being involved in the coup attempt and other individuals, such as the applicants in the present cases, who were not directly involved in the coup attempt but were alleged to have links to the organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” ( Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması ), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt. Relying, in particular, on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants complained about the searches conducted in their houses, offices, vehicles or on their person. They alleged in particular that these searches were not in compliance with section 88 of Law no. 2802, which prohibited the conduct of searches in the houses of judges and prosecutors or on their persons, except for cases of discovery of commission of an offense in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ rights under Article 8 of the Convention on account of the searches conducted in their houses, offices, vehicles or on their person?   If so, was the interference in accordance with the law in terms of Article   8 §   2?   In particular, were the searches carried out in accordance with the relevant legislation (see, mutatis mutandis , Baş v. Turkey , no. 66448/17, §§   145-158, 3   March 2020, and Tercan v. Turkey , no. 6158/18, §§ 199-201, 29   June 2021)?       APPENDIX   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 22179/19 Akıncı v. Türkiye 16/04/2019 Kadriye AKINCI 1981 Şanlıurfa Turkish Emine Sevil KOYUNCU 2. 29075/19 Ş.D. v. Türkiye 13/05/2019 Ş. D. 1977 Çanakkale Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 3. 35389/19 Şişman v. Türkiye 28/05/2019 Özcan ŞİŞMAN 1970 Ankara Turkish   4. 44532/19 Çaylı v. Türkiye 01/08/2019 Ramazan ÇAYLI 1978 Zonguldak Turkish   5. 34742/21 Peksak v. Türkiye 23/06/2021 Ali Efendi PEKSAK 1969 Istanbul Turkish   6. 6196/22 Sayar v. Türkiye 21/01/2022 Hasan SAYAR 1978 Istanbul Turkish   7. 36862/22 Mercan v. Türkiye 05/07/2022 Halil MERCAN 1985 Istanbul Turkish      Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 21 novembre 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-238626
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel