CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 29 novembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sB4B39BDE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 16 December 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no. 6597/20 Enver EVREN against Türkiye and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 29 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the rejection of the applicants’ requests for their transfer to a prison located closer to the place of residence of their families. The applicants were serving a prison sentence at the relevant time. The Ministry of Justice refused the applicants’ requests stating that the prisons to which they wished to be transferred were full. Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants allege that their repeated requests to be transferred to a prison located closer to their families’ place of residence were rejected without sufficient justification. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention on account of the refusal of the domestic authorities to authorise the transfer of the applicants to a prison located closer to their families’ place of residence (see Avşar and Tekin v.   Turkey , nos. 19302/09 and 49089/12, §§ 60-74, 17   September 2019)?     APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 6597/20 Evren v. Türkiye 16/12/2019 Enver EVREN 1977 İzmir Turkish   2. 11854/22 Hacıpaşalıoğlu v. Türkiye 18/02/2022 Haydar HACIPAŞALIOĞLU 1977 Konya Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 3. 2882/23 Çizmeci v. Türkiye 28/12/2022 Ersan ÇİZMECİ 1987 Manisa Turkish