CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 11 décembre 2024

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .sD67E8F64 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.85pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#ffffff } .s452FAC2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:7.5pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s9505E831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#171717 } .s2D2609FF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:7.5pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFAB4775 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#171717 } .sAF77ACE4 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.67pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super; color:#171717 } .s95CADA27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:7.5pt; font-size:11.5pt } .sEA19A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#171717 } .s1A8C3523 { border:1pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sB056A3E5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:4.9pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sC5ECFB78 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s3C5C3DF { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s31E04105 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:4.9pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sE8D5B928 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s50A8AB78 { padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sA9600011 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:7.5pt; text-indent:-18pt; font-size:11.5pt } .sABC84D6A { font-family:Arial; font-size:7pt; color:#171717 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s906D94D6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:7.5pt; font-size:11.5pt } .s19630D3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:7.5pt; text-indent:36pt; font-size:11.5pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)434 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Three cases against Republic of Moldova (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 December 2024 at the 1515 th   meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 28650/05 DRONIC 16/02/2021 22/11/2022 16/02/2021 22/11/2022 522/13 MUNTEANU 14/12/2021 14/12/2021 14323/13+ POMUL S.R.L. AND SUBERVIN S.R.L. 24/10/2023 24/01/2024 The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”), Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of failure of the State to enforce final domestic judgments; Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required: -               of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible   restitutio in integrum ; and -               of general measures preventing similar violations; Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation; Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to execute the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document   DH-DD(2024)1301 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the Court awarded just satisfaction in respect of pecuniary damage, covering the countervalue of the non-enforced domestic judgements; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the   Olaru   group of cases also in the light of the Court’s findings in these cases, and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required; DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases; CONCLUDES that the necessary individual measures have been adopted; DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures in the framework of the   Olaru   group; DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.