CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s68B4801B { margin-left:32.17pt; padding-left:3.83pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .s1D31B7BA { margin-left:36pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .sE8AFF07F { height:92.95pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 24 February 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 20639/23 Adnan YILMAZ against Türkiye and 95 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 7 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications mainly concern the applicants’ arrest and pre-trial detention, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “ Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure ”), in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état which took place on 15 July 2016. The applicants complain of a violation of Article   5 of the Convention on the basis of the following allegations (see the appended table for detailed information as to the specific complaints raised by each applicant): -   They were detained in the absence of any suspicion that they committed an offence; -   There were no relevant and sufficient reasons to justify their initial and/or continued pre-trial detention; -   The length of their pre-trial detention was excessive; -   The reviews of detention took place without a hearing and they were not notified of the opinion of the public prosecutor on those reviews; -   Their access to the investigation files was restricted; -   The objections to their detention or their requests for release were not examined or examined belatedly; -   The decisions extending their pre-trial detention were not notified to them, or were notified with a delay, which prevented them from objecting against those decisions; -   They did not benefit from effective legal assistance and facilities to challenge their detention, having particular regard to the fact that their communication with their lawyers was monitored by the prison authorities; -   The time taken by the Constitutional Court to conduct its examination of their individual applications was excessive. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES On the basis of the complaints communicated in accordance with the list in the Appendix   1.     Can the applicants be considered to have been detained on the basis of “a reasonable suspicion” that they had committed an offence, for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention (see, in particular, Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom , 30   August 1990, § 32, Series A No. 182), taking into account, in particular, Article   100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires “concrete evidence demonstrating the existence of strong suspicions” as to the commission of the offence? Moreover, has the Constitutional Court based the existence of reasonable suspicion on evidence discovered after the decisions had been taken to detain the applicants (see, in particular, Baş v. Turkey , no. 66448/17, § 185, 3   March 2020)?   2.     Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article   5   §   3 of the Convention? In particular: (i)     Did the judges who ordered the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention and the prolongation of their detention, and who examined the objections lodged against those decisions, fulfil their obligation to provide relevant and sufficient grounds for the deprivation of liberty in question (see, in particular, Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no.   23755/07, §   102, 5 July 2016)? (ii)     Was the length of the applicants’ pre-trial detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?   3.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective remedy by which they could challenge the lawfulness of their deprivation of liberty, as required by Article   5 §   4 of the Convention? In particular, the Government are invited to respond to the following complaints made by the applicants: (i)     the principle of equality of arms had not been respected, as the decisions to extend their detention and their objections to those decisions had been examined without a hearing and the prosecutors’ opinions had not been communicated to them (see, in particular, Baş , cited above, §§   212-14, and Kocamış and Kurt v. Turkey , no.   227/13, §§ 34-35, 25 January 2022); (ii)     they had been unable to challenge their detention in an effective manner because of the restriction imposed on their access to the investigation file (see, inter alia , Ceviz v. Turkey , no. 8140/08, § 41, 17   July 2012); (iii)     their objections to their detention or requests for release had not been examined or had been examined belatedly (see, for example, Shannon v.   Latvia , no. 32214/03, §§   67-74, 24 November 2009); (iv)     the decisions to extend their detention had not been notified to them or had been notified with a delay, which had prevented them from lodging objections against those decisions (compare, for example, Voskuil v.   the   Netherlands , no. 64752/01, § 83, 22 November 2007); (v)     they had not had effective legal assistance or facilities to challenge their detention, having particular regard to the fact that their communication with their lawyers had been monitored (see, mutatis mutandis , Černák v.   Slovakia , no.   36997/08, § 78, 17 December 2013); (vi)     the time taken by the Constitutional Court to examine their individual applications had been excessive (compare for the relevant principles Kavala v.   Turkey , no. 28749/18, §§ 181-84, 10 December 2019).   4.     Did the compensation remedy provided under Article   141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure constitute an effective remedy, within the meaning of Article   5 §   4 of the Convention, in respect of any of the applicants’ complaints?     APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by Complaints for each application   20639/23 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 24/05/2023 Adnan YILMAZ 1971 Isparta Turkish Zülal BÜKER Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   21335/23 Ergutekin v. Türkiye 08/05/2023 İdris ERGUTEKİN 1986 Malatya Turkish Mehmet Akif ARGIN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   23118/23 Bingöl v. Türkiye 30/05/2023 Büşra BİNGÖL 1992 Istanbul Turkish Ayşe DURMUŞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   23123/23 Yalçın v. Türkiye 23/05/2023 Bülent YALÇIN 1974 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   23778/23 Güzeltaş v. Türkiye 23/05/2023 Tolga GÜZELTAŞ 1982 Istanbul Turkish Demet SAATÇİOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file   24567/23 Köz v. Türkiye 01/06/2023 Yusuf KÖZ 1976 Ankara Turkish   Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   26189/23 Şişman v. Türkiye 26/06/2023 Adem ŞİŞMAN 1975 Denizli Turkish Uğur BAY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   26234/23 Desovalı v. Türkiye 14/06/2023 İsmail DESOVALI 1980 Çorum Turkish Zehra ARSLAN ALKAÇ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   26790/23 Demir v. Türkiye 23/06/2023 Ahmet DEMİR 1992 Mersin Turkish Özcan AKINCI Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   26968/23 Karaarslan v. Türkiye 26/05/2023 Erkan KARAARSLAN 1975 Ankara Turkish     Lack of hearing during the detention review   27780/23 Fedakar v. Türkiye 03/07/2023 Seyfullah FEDAKAR 1985 Samsun Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   27805/23 Kuvvetlioğlu v. Türkiye 11/07/2023 Burhan KUVVETLİOĞLU 1984 İzmir Turkish Muhammet Taha SEVİLİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   27904/23 Aksoy v. Türkiye 07/07/2023 Süleyman AKSOY 1981 Gaziantep Turkish   Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   27969/23 Coşkun v. Türkiye 03/07/2023 Doğukan COŞKUN 1989 İzmir Turkish Yaşar GÜNGÖR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   28480/23 Kızılay v. Türkiye 12/07/2023 Arzu KIZILAY 1991 Ankara Turkish Seydi Ahmet ÖZDEMİR Lack of reasonable suspicion   29271/23 Koç v. Türkiye 17/07/2023 Mustafa Kemal KOÇ 1983 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Yadigar GÖNÜLLÜ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   30991/23 Çabukoğlu v. Türkiye 22/06/2023 Fatih ÇABUKOĞLU 1991 Balıkesir Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ Lack of reasonable suspicion   31693/23 Gökçen v. Türkiye 10/07/2023 Hüseyin GÖKÇEN 1975 İzmir Turkish Ömer KÖSTEKÇİ Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   31814/23 Göçer v. Türkiye 04/08/2023 Mustafa GÖÇER 1978 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   32607/23 Ceylan v. Türkiye 10/08/2023 Aydın CEYLAN 1993 Uşak Turkish Adnan ERDOĞAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   32740/23 Aşık v. Türkiye 16/08/2023 Süleyman AŞIK 1963 Denizli Turkish Mehmet MİRZA Lack of reasonable suspicion   32774/23 Esmer v. Türkiye 11/08/2023 Sultan ESMER 1982 Ankara Turkish Hasan TOK Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   33149/23 Çınar v. Türkiye 25/08/2023 Fuat ÇINAR 1973 Eskişehir Turkish Zümrüt ŞAHİN Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   33286/23 Ceylan v. Türkiye 25/08/2023 Yahya Tekin CEYLAN 1976 Adana Turkish Yahya DEMİREL Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   34676/23 Işık v. Türkiye 08/09/2023 Özgür IŞIK 1986 Ankara Turkish Mustafa KOÇ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   35910/23 Yavaşlar v. Türkiye 20/09/2023 Alaattin YAVAŞLAR 1960 Denizli Turkish Tarık AVŞAR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   37499/23 Yaman v. Türkiye 05/10/2023 Cemal YAMAN 1987 Yozgat Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   37643/23 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 13/10/2023 Neşe YILMAZ 1981 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   39015/23 Cansever v. Türkiye 09/10/2023 Cumhur CANSEVER 1982 Giresun Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention Lack of examination of release requests by appeal courts   40213/23 Varçın v. Türkiye 10/11/2023 Murat VARÇIN 1983 Istanbul Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   40378/23 Çağlayan v. Türkiye 07/11/2023 Selim ÇAĞLAYAN 1988 Turkish Üsame İNAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   40409/23 Bozay v. Türkiye 13/11/2023 Merve BOZAY 1988 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   40468/23 Zengin v. Türkiye 11/11/2023 Adem ZENGİN 1968 İzmir Turkish Orçun MUŞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion   40642/23 Çulha v. Türkiye 31/10/2023 Mustafa ÇULHA 1968 Amasya Turkish Kübra KAZANCI TOSUN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   40877/23 Tabak v. Türkiye 06/11/2023 Salih TABAK 1989 Bursa Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of hearing during the detention review Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   40931/23 Şahiner v. Türkiye 09/11/2023 İbrahim ŞAHİNER 1976 Turkish Halil ŞAHİN Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   41851/23 Uyanık v. Türkiye 29/11/2023 Ercan UYANIK 1972 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   42302/23 Aydın v. Türkiye 27/11/2023 Şükrü AYDIN 1993 Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   42764/23 Yalçın v. Türkiye 11/12/2023 Aytekin YALÇIN 1972 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   43004/23 Tokmak v. Türkiye 05/12/2023 Cemalettin TOKMAK 1964 Ankara Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   359/24 Pehlivanlı v. Türkiye 26/12/2023 Fikri PEHLİVANLI 1978 Ankara Turkish Levent MAZILIGÜNEY Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   436/24 Çelik v. Türkiye 20/12/2023 Sevilay ÇELİK 1978 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   560/24 Kasım v. Türkiye 19/12/2023 Mehmet Mete KASIM 1990 Istanbul Turkish Hanifi BAYRI Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   631/24 Karaduman v. Türkiye 28/12/2023 Filiz KARADUMAN 1979 Yozgat Turkish Didem Gizem ÇAMLIOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   662/24 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 28/12/2023 Feruzan YILDIRIM 1967 Manisa Turkish Yavuz CAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   1062/24 Alkın v. Türkiye 01/12/2023 Bülent ALKIN 1973 İzmir Turkish Ruveyda Şule AK Lack of reasonable suspicion   1607/24 Emre v. Türkiye 28/12/2023 Muhammet EMRE 1983 Balıkesir Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   1820/24 Sarı v. Türkiye 27/12/2023 Mehmet SARI 1973 Kocaeli Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   2197/24 Kaya v. Türkiye 11/01/2024 Mustafa KAYA 1992 Ankara Turkish Hilmi ŞENCANLAR Lack of reasonable suspicion   4184/24 Gümüş v. Türkiye 09/01/2024 Muhammet GÜMÜŞ 1991 İzmir Turkish Orçun MUŞLU Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   4935/24 Dönmez v. Türkiye 29/01/2024 Bekir DÖNMEZ 1982 Edirne Turkish Mehmet ÖKSÜZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   5248/24 Gürkök v. Türkiye 05/02/2024 Süleyman GÜRKÖK 1970 Kayseri Turkish Hilmi ŞENCANLAR Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of examination of release requests by appeal courts   5889/24 Aydın v. Türkiye 13/02/2024 Mehmet AYDIN 1979 Mersin Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   6119/24 Güçlü v. Türkiye 23/02/2024 Özgür GÜÇLÜ 1986 Turkish Tarık AVŞAR Lack of reasonable suspicion   6373/24 Parmaksız Şen v. Türkiye 14/02/2024 Talih PARMAKSIZ ŞEN 1990 Muğla Turkish Ali AVCI Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   6835/24 Kahraman v. Türkiye 20/02/2024 Recep KAHRAMAN 1976 Düzce Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file   7031/24 Yelesdağ v. Türkiye 19/02/2024 İbrahim YELESDAĞ 1978 Istanbul Turkish Cengiz ALGÜL Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file   7159/24 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 01/03/2024 Zekeriya YILMAZ 1976 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR Restriction of access to the investigation file   7211/24 Bakırcan v. Türkiye 01/03/2024 Hüseyin BAKIRCAN 1984 Sakarya Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file   8134/24 Adlim v. Türkiye 08/03/2024 Seda ADLİM 1989 Ankara Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   9472/24 Bekçi v. Türkiye 14/03/2024 Mertcan BEKÇİ 1998 Ankara Turkish Zümrüt ŞAHİN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   9653/24 Uçar v. Türkiye 19/03/2024 Serkan UÇAR 1978 Istanbul Turkish Ayşe BAL GÜLFİDAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   9656/24 Bilge v. Türkiye 22/03/2024 Bilal BİLGE 1986 Istanbul Turkish Okan GÜNEL Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   9877/24 Başdemir v. Türkiye 21/03/2024 Muhammed Hasan BAŞDEMİR 1986 Konya Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   9911/24 Erdoğan v. Türkiye 18/03/2024 Fatih ERDOĞAN 1978 Ankara Turkish Didem Gizem ÇAMLIOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion   9989/24 Takavcu v. Türkiye 30/03/2024 Abdullah Esad TAKAVCU 1995 Erzincan Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   11226/24 Tatlı v. Türkiye 05/04/2024 Muhammed Yavuz TATLI 2002 Istanbul Turkish Büşra Nur KALE EKİNCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file   11603/24 Şahin v. Türkiye 25/03/2024 Ömer ŞAHİN 1991 Uşak Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Length of pre-trial detention   12156/24 Akın v. Türkiye 24/04/2024 Ural AKIN 1977 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet Arif YALÇINKAYA Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   12545/24 Sarıca v. Türkiye 26/04/2024 Nurullah SARICA 1986 Ankara Turkish Hasan TOK Lack of reasonable suspicion   12769/24 Göde v. Türkiye 19/04/2024 Hülya GÖDE 1988 Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   13666/24 Uzunlar v. Türkiye 06/05/2024 İlker UZUNLAR 1975 İzmir Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   13892/24 Kaplan v. Türkiye 16/04/2024 Tahsin KAPLAN 1988 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   13999/24 Fırat v. Türkiye 03/05/2024 Fatih FIRAT 1978 Ankara Turkish Uğur ALTUN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Lack of examination of release requests by appeal courts   14099/24 Akyüz v. Türkiye 18/04/2024 Muhammet Ali AKYÜZ 1979 Diyarbakır Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention   14229/24 Mayda v. Türkiye 07/05/2024 Mehmet Sinan MAYDA 1997 Kırıkkale Turkish Enes Bahadır BAŞKÖY Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   14461/24 Ulu v. Türkiye 21/05/2024 Çiğdem ULU 1993 Istanbul Turkish Ahmet EROL Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   14635/24 Gümüş v. Türkiye 07/05/2024 Ümit GÜMÜŞ 1974 Istanbul Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   15279/24 İpek v. Türkiye 17/05/2024 Bülent İPEK 1972 Antalya Turkish Kerim DUMAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   16441/24 Düvencioğlu v. Türkiye 11/06/2024 Turgay DÜVENCİOĞLU 1987 Samsun Turkish Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   16803/24 Berker v. Türkiye 13/06/2024 Abdurrahman Bahadır BERKER 1988 Balıkesir Turkish Zafer İRAZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   17459/24 Akkaya v. Türkiye 06/06/2024 Zeki AKKAYA 1982 Kırıkkale Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   17705/24 Şentürk v. Türkiye 06/06/2024 Uğur ŞENTÜRK 1979 Antalya Turkish Kerim DUMAN Lack of reasonable suspicion   18716/24 Kurtcu v. Türkiye 03/07/2024 Ayşe KURTCU 1977 Mersin Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR Lack of reasonable suspicion   18958/24 Diken v. Türkiye 28/06/2024 Ömer DİKEN 1969 İzmir Turkish Karar Koray ATAK Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Length of pre-trial detention   19050/24 Çevik v. Türkiye 03/07/2024 Hasan ÇEVİK 1982 Ankara Turkish Muhammet GÜNEY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   19416/24 Aksın v. Türkiye 25/06/2024 Yunus AKSIN 1970 Kocaeli Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   19909/24 Adlim v. Türkiye 08/07/2024 Muhittin ADLİM 1986 Ankara Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   20938/24 Yurdakul v. Türkiye 09/07/2024 Murat YURDAKUL 1997 İstanbul Turkish Naciye Refia ÇOKER Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   21156/24 Gülen v. Türkiye 18/07/2024 Nur GÜLEN 1984 İzmir Turkish Fatma Nur GÖKÇE UYSAL Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   21289/24 Doğru v. Türkiye 22/07/2024 Ergin DOĞRU 1981 Ankara Turkish Ferhat MEMMEDZADE Lack of reasonable suspicion   21694/24 Canöz v. Türkiye 21/06/2024 Alparslan CANÖZ 1975 Ankara Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   21824/24 Esen v. Türkiye 08/07/2024 Cemil ESEN 1990 Istanbul Turkish Ömer Faruk ESEN Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Length of pre-trial detention   21825/24 Tuner v. Türkiye 02/07/2024 Ahu TUNER 1982 Ankara Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Restriction of access to the investigation file   23927/24 Ekinci v. Türkiye 26/07/2024 Halis EKİNCİ 1974 Istanbul Turkish Büşra Nur KALE EKİNCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   24020/24 Önre v. Türkiye 26/07/2024 Ramazan ÖNRE 1982 Istanbul Turkish Büşra Nur KALE EKİNCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of examination of release requests by appeal courts