CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s9C156EF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s96D82958 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s11B18BC0 { margin-left:13.34pt; padding-left:4.66pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s57E44538 { margin-left:18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s817F0FC { margin-left:18pt; text-indent:-18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .sE2609E1C { width:11.54pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 24 February 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 38878/22 Zafer KURT against Türkiye and 101 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 7 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications mainly concern the applicants’ arrest and pre-trial detention, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “ Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” ), in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état which took place on 15 July 2016. The applicants complain of a violation of Article 5 of the Convention on the basis of the following allegations (see the appended table for detailed information as to the specific complaints raised by each applicant): - They were detained in the absence of any suspicion that they committed an offence; - There were no relevant and sufficient reasons to justify their initial and/or continued pre-trial detention; - The length of their pre-trial detention was excessive; - The reviews of detention took place without a hearing and they were not notified of the opinion of the public prosecutor on those reviews; - Their access to the investigation files was restricted; - The objections to their detention or their requests for release were not examined or examined belatedly; - The decisions extending their pre-trial detention were not notified to them, or were notified with a delay, which prevented them from objecting against those decisions; - They did not benefit from effective legal assistance and facilities to challenge their detention, having particular regard to the fact that their communication with their lawyers was monitored by the prison authorities; - The time taken by the Constitutional Court to conduct its examination of their individual applications was excessive. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES On the basis of the complaints communicated in accordance with the list in the Appendix   1.     Can the applicants be considered to have been detained on the basis of “a reasonable suspicion” that they had committed an offence, for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention (see, in particular, Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom , 30 August 1990, § 32, Series A No.   182), taking into account, in particular, Article 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires “concrete evidence demonstrating the existence of strong suspicions” as to the commission of the offence? Moreover, has the Constitutional Court based the existence of reasonable suspicion on evidence discovered after the decisions had been taken to detain the applicants (see, in particular, Baş v. Turkey , no. 66448/17, § 185, 3   March 2020)?   2.     Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention? In particular: (i)     Did the judges, who ordered the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention and the prolongation of their detention, and who examined the objections lodged against those decisions, fulfil their obligation to provide relevant and sufficient grounds for the deprivation of liberty in question (see, in particular, Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 102, 5 July 2016)? (ii)     Was the length of the applicants’ pre-trial detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?   3.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective remedy by which they could challenge the lawfulness of their deprivation of liberty, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention? In particular, the Government are invited to respond to the following complaints made by the applicants: (i)     the principle of equality of arms had not been respected, as the decisions to extend their detention and their objections to those decisions had been examined without a hearing and the prosecutors’ opinions had not been communicated to them (see, in particular, Baş , cited above, §§   212-14, and Kocamış and Kurt v. Turkey , no. 227/13, §§ 34-35, 25 January 2022); (ii)     they had been unable to challenge their detention in an effective manner because of the restriction imposed on their access to the investigation file (see, inter alia , Ceviz v. Turkey , no. 8140/08, § 41, 17   July 2012); (iii)     their objections to their detention had not been examined or had been examined belatedly (see, for example, Shannon v. Latvia , no.   32214/03, §§   67-74, 24 November 2009); (iv)     the decisions to extend their detention had not been notified to them or had been notified with a delay, which had prevented them from lodging objections against those decisions (compare, for example, Voskuil v.   the   Netherlands , no. 64752/01, § 83, 22 November 2007); (v)     they had not had effective legal assistance or facilities to challenge their detention, having particular regard to the fact that their communication with their lawyers had been monitored (see, mutatis mutandis , Černák v.   Slovakia , no.   36997/08, § 78, 17 December 2013); (vi)     the time taken by the Constitutional Court to examine their individual applications had been excessive (compare for the relevant principles Kavala v.   Turkey , no. 28749/18, §§ 181-84, 10 December 2019). 4.     Did the compensation remedy provided under Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure constitute an effective remedy, within the meaning of Article   5 §   4 of the Convention, in respect of any of the applicants’ complaints?   APPENDIX List of cases:   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by     Complaints for each application   38878/22 Kurt v. Türkiye 21/07/2022 Zafer KURT 1979 Istanbul Turkish   Emre AKARYILDIZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   38879/22 Parıltı v. Türkiye 21/07/2022 Abbas PARILTI 1976 Erzincan Turkish   Dursun İZCİ Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   39231/22 Derin v. Türkiye 29/07/2022 Nezaket DERİN 1980 Kayseri Turkish   Özcan AKINCI Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   39420/22 Özçiftçi v. Türkiye 30/07/2022 Erdoğan ÖZÇİFTÇİ 1959 İzmir Turkish Yavuz CAN Lack of reasonable suspicion   39793/22 Yeşildal v. Türkiye 22/07/2022 Mustafa Mürsel YEŞİLDAL 1999 Istanbul Turkish Cengiz ALGÜL Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   40682/22 Ebrinç v. Türkiye 22/07/2022 Necmettin EBRİNÇ 1986 Çorum Turkish Arzu BEYAZIT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   41536/22 Akpınar v. Türkiye 01/08/2022 Vahit AKPINAR 1981 Antalya Turkish Kamile KILDAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   42575/22 Sarıtaş v. Türkiye 20/08/2022 Ali SARITAŞ 1984 Kayseri Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   42929/22 Tunç v. Türkiye 01/08/2022 Kenan TUNÇ 1986 Konya Turkish Leyla MESUTOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion   43360/22 Korkmaz v. Türkiye 01/08/2022 Burak KORKMAZ 1991 Çorum Turkish Ennur ÖZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   44168/22 Bozkurt v. Türkiye 02/09/2022 Salih BOZKURT 1976 Eskişehir Turkish Zeynep Betül EROĞUL Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   44199/22 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 05/09/2022 Fuat YILDIRIM 1976 İzmir Turkish Büşra ARSLAN Lack of reasonable suspicion   44274/22 Demir v. Türkiye 17/08/2022 Abdurrahman DEMİR 1986 Diyarbakır Turkish   Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   44967/22 Dinçer v. Türkiye 15/09/2022 Gülsüm Havva DİNÇER 1971 Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   44985/22 Emirdağı v. Türkiye 12/09/2022 Haşim EMİRDAĞI 1971 Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   45479/22 Kılıç v. Türkiye 13/09/2022 Hasan KILIÇ 1973 Nevşehir Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   47288/22 Çolak v. Türkiye 27/09/2022 Bilal ÇOLAK 1993 Amsterdam Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   47306/22 Aksoy v. Türkiye 01/10/2022 Hicret AKSOY 1994 Mardin Turkish Eyyup AKINCI Lack of reasonable suspicion   47492/22 Ekici v. Türkiye 29/09/2022 Murat EKİCİ 1984 Ankara Turkish Gizay DULKADİR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   48074/22 Demirci v. Türkiye 28/09/2022 Enes Burak DEMİRCİ 1998 Ankara Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   48126/22 Malkatan v. Türkiye 05/10/2022 Kamil Yavuz MALKATAN 1964 Ankara Turkish Yakup GÖNEN Lack of reasonable suspicion   49214/22 Şanal v. Türkiye 03/10/2022 Mehmet Han ŞANAL 1994 Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   50230/22 Sarıkaya v. Türkiye 12/10/2022 Yakup Harun SARIKAYA 1983 Istanbul Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   50444/22 Ardıç v. Türkiye 14/10/2022 Serap ARDIÇ 1988 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Erkan DEMİR Lack of reasonable suspicion   50603/22 Karakaya v. Türkiye 17/10/2022 Nevzat KARAKAYA 1972 Çanakkale Turkish Abdullah TOMUR Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   50759/22 Erden v. Türkiye 21/10/2022 Muhammet ERDEN 1989 Konya Turkish Rümeysa DENİZ Lack of reasonable suspicion   51176/22 Ortakçı v. Türkiye 20/10/2022 Yasin ORTAKÇI 1981 Karabük Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   51294/22 Balcı v. Türkiye 19/10/2022 Murat BALCI 1990 Istanbul Turkish Emre AKARYILDIZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   51439/22 Koşar v. Türkiye 03/10/2022 Ayhan KOŞAR 1970 Eskişehir Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   51711/22 Aydın v. Türkiye 24/10/2022 Yunus AYDIN 1963 Istanbul Turkish Emre AKARYILDIZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   52237/22 Dinç v. Türkiye 06/10/2022 Ali DİNÇ 1982 Erzincan Turkish Kamile KILDAN Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   53288/22 Kartbak v. Türkiye 07/11/2022 Giray KARTBAK 1986 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   53473/22 Aktan v. Türkiye 02/11/2022 Şerayim Recep AKTAN 1985 İzmir Turkish Zeynep UZUNALİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   53900/22 Gökdaş v. Türkiye 14/11/2022 Bülent GÖKDAŞ 1975 Istanbul Turkish Ahmet EROL Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   54264/22 Şarlakkaya v. Türkiye 21/10/2022 Yüksel ŞARLAKKAYA 1978 Bursa Turkish Ebubekir RENK Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   55226/22 Çamur v. Türkiye 21/11/2022 Yaşar ÇAMUR 1966 İzmir Turkish Zeynep UZUNALİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   56334/22 Özbek v. Türkiye 25/11/2022 Ercan ÖZBEK İzmir Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   56647/22 Okay v. Türkiye 29/11/2022 Hakan OKAY 1982 Bursa Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   113/23 Kılınç v. Türkiye 15/12/2022 Bülent KILINÇ 1971 Düzce Turkish Ahmet EROL Lack of reasonable suspicion   571/23 Olgun v. Türkiye 22/12/2022 Talip OLGUN 1987 Samsun Turkish Tahir EREN Lack of reasonable suspicion   741/23 Oksuz v. Türkiye 22/02/2022 Vedat OKSUZ 1974 Sincan Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   857/23 Altıkat v. Türkiye 24/12/2022 Abdurrahim ALTIKAT 1988 Ankara Turkish İrem ÖZTÜRK Lack of reasonable suspicion   891/23 Günaydın v. Türkiye 22/12/2022 Hasan GÜNAYDIN 1983 Samsun Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   931/23 Uçar v. Türkiye 01/12/2022 Yasin UÇAR 1984 Istanbul Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   946/23 Mercan v. Türkiye 22/12/2022 Süleyman MERCAN 1976 Ankara Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   1005/23 İşsenin v. Türkiye 30/12/2022 Mehmet İŞSENİN 1981 İzmir Turkish Ahmet Salim ÇAKMAK Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   1056/23 Eser v. Türkiye 28/12/2022 Kenan ESER 1974 Kastamonu Turkish Esra ACAR Lack of reasonable suspicion   1746/23 Temizsoy v. Türkiye 05/12/2022 Hasan TEMİZSOY 1987 Ankara Turkish Arzu BEYAZIT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   1953/23 Kaya v. Türkiye 06/12/2022 İsmail Useyd KAYA 1992 İzmir Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   2276/23 Kıymaz v. Türkiye 28/12/2022 Cemil KIYMAZ 1983 Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS Lack of reasonable suspicion   2672/23 Özcan v. Türkiye 30/11/2022 Murat ÖZCAN 1979 Adana Turkish   Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Length of pre-trial detention   2689/23 Kaya v. Türkiye 15/12/2022 Yusuf Alp KAYA 1988 Ankara Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   3001/23 Bulat v. Türkiye 06/12/2022 Hacı Hüseyin BULAT 1991 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   3006/23 Öztürk v. Türkiye 01/12/2022 Kemalettin ÖZTÜRK 1988 Hatay Turkish Dudu ERTUNÇ Lack of hearing during the detention review   3448/23 Arıkboğa v. Türkiye 06/01/2023 Burak ARIKBOĞA 1989 Ankara Turkish Muhammet ÜSTÜN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   3508/23 Babacan v. Türkiye 05/01/2023 Osman BABACAN 1980 Istanbul Turkish Serdar AYDIN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   3564/23 Kul v. Türkiye 09/01/2023 Esat KUL 1981 Ankara Turkish Meryem GÜNAY Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   3977/23 Şeker v. Türkiye 06/01/2023 Ömer ŞEKER 1986 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDI Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   4390/23 Esmer v. Türkiye 17/01/2023 Mahmut ESMER Ankara Turkish Hasan TOK Lack of reasonable suspicion   4606/23 Çikrıkci v. Türkiye 05/01/2023 Kadir ÇİKRIKCİ 1977 Istanbul Turkish Arzu BEYAZIT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   5511/23 Mertcan v. Türkiye 16/01/2023 Muhammed Enes MERTCAN 1989 Kars Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   6346/23 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 09/01/2023 Fedayi YILMAZ 1975 Ankara Turkish Mustafa KOÇ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   6363/23 Demir v. Türkiye 19/01/2023 Orhan DEMİR 1980 Antalya Turkish Zeynep UZUNALİ Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   6650/23 Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye 20/01/2023 Hasan YALÇINKAYA 1977 Samsun Turkish İnan UZUN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   7850/23 Öz v. Türkiye 02/02/2023 Serhat ÖZ 1986 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   8741/23 Baykal v. Türkiye 15/02/2023 Yunus Emre BAYKAL 1993 Muğla Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   8837/23 Ertaş v. Türkiye 14/02/2023 Hasan Hüseyin ERTAŞ 1982 Kayseri Turkish Safiye YILMAZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file   9174/23 Ateş v. Türkiye 20/02/2023 Nuri ATEŞ 1965 Ankara Turkish Sümeyra ATEŞ BOZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   9212/23 Cansız v. Türkiye 25/01/2023 Serkan CANSIZ 1973 Bursa Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   9250/23 Baştuğ v. Türkiye 14/02/2023 Merve BAŞTUĞ 1990 Istanbul Turkish Yadigar GÖNÜLLÜ Lack of reasonable suspicion   9954/23 Özler v. Türkiye 01/03/2023 Rahime ÖZLER 1978 Isparta Turkish Zülal BÜKER Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of hearing during the detention review   9968/23 Sarıkaya v. Türkiye 07/02/2023 Rasim SARIKAYA 1979 Ankara Turkish Naciye Refia ÇOKER Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   10747/23 Alpdoğan v. Türkiye 07/02/2023 Ahmet ALPDOĞAN 1995 Istanbul Turkish Mahir ORAK Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   10875/23 Bulat v. Türkiye 27/02/2023 Cağrı BULAT 1987 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file   11114/23 Korkusuz v. Türkiye 17/02/2023 Mücahit Şeyhşamil KORKUSUZ 1996 Bursa Turkish Mustafa YELBEY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   11381/23 Arslanoğlu v. Türkiye 23/02/2023 Mehmet ARSLANOĞLU 1985 Istanbul Turkish Yadigar GÖNÜLLÜ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   13030/23 Karaçam v. Türkiye 09/03/2023 Recep KARAÇAM 1973 Istanbul Turkish Oktay ÖNAL Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention   13211/23 Topçuoğlu v. Türkiye 20/03/2023 Menderes TOPÇUOĞLU 1985 Ankara Turkish Ömer Faruk ERGÜN Lack of reasonable suspicion   13281/23 Öner v. Türkiye 24/03/2023 Mahfuz ÖNER 1981 Istanbul Turkish Ahmet EROL Lack of reasonable suspicion   13571/23 Beltek v. Türkiye 27/02/2023 Akın BELTEK 1988 Antalya Turkish Zeynep UZUNALİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   13577/23 Özdikiş v. Türkiye 27/02/2023 Ali Harun ÖZDİKİŞ 1980 İzmir Turkish Zeynep UZUNALİ Lack of reasonable suspicion   13601/23 Fırat v. Türkiye 16/03/2023 Orhan FIRAT 1979 Rize Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   14521/23 Kocagöz v. Türkiye 06/03/2023 Özkan KOCAGÖZ 1984 Sakarya Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   15099/23 Turan v. Türkiye 17/03/2023 Saadet TURAN 1982 Malatya Turkish Mehmet Raşit NAS Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   15568/23 Taşdelen v. Türkiye 06/04/2023 Zafer TAŞDELEN 1973 Ankara Turkish Mehmet ÖNCÜ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   15689/23 Bağdat v. Türkiye 08/03/2023 Fuat BAĞDAT 1985 Istanbul Turkish Emre AKARYILDIZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   15734/23 Kargı v. Türkiye 03/04/2023 Şevki KARGI 1983 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   15746/23 Kılıç v. Türkiye 04/04/2023 Hasan Tayfur KILIÇ 1993 Sakarya Turkish Ahmet EROL Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file   16165/23 Dere v. Türkiye 17/04/2023 Zeynep DERE 1992 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR Lack of reasonable suspicion   16608/23 Özutku v. Türkiye 14/03/2023 Sevda ÖZUTKU 1972 Antalya Turkish Muhammet DEMİREL Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   16715/23 Çelikbilek v. Türkiye 17/04/2023 Raşit ÇELİKBİLEK 1971 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   16716/23 Tomruk v. Türkiye 31/03/2023 Sedat TOMRUK 1969 Bolu Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   16722/23 Doğaç v. Türkiye 04/04/2023 Muammer DOĞAÇ 1982 İzmir Turkish Nurullah TEKİN Lack of reasonable suspicion   17134/23 Dişbudak v. Türkiye 28/03/2023 Bilal DİŞBUDAK 1990 Bursa Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞIN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   17478/23 Ovalı v. Türkiye 10/04/2023 Abdullah Zühtü OVALI 1959 Konya Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   18363/23 Palancı v. Türkiye 06/04/2023 Burak Ahmet PALANCI 1994 Istanbul Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   18557/23 Akdağ v. Türkiye 14/04/2023 Yücel AKDAĞ 1970 Karaman Turkish   Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   18913/23 Sancaktutar v. Türkiye 12/04/2023 Muhammet Furkan SANCAKTUTAR 1987 Ankara Turkish Nihal KARAGÖZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   19324/23 Demir v. Türkiye 03/04/2023 Hasan DEMİR 1981 Bursa Turkish Ömer Baran DÜŞÜNÜR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of hearing during the detention review           19881/23 Bozay v. Türkiye 02/05/2023 Ömer BOZAY 1986 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention           19970/23 Kara v. Türkiye 03/05/2023 Yeliz KARA 1981 Zonguldak Turkish Fuat KARA Lack of reasonable suspicion           20472/23 Aslan v. Türkiye 25/04/2023 Süleyman ASLAN 1970 Antalya Turkish Hüsnü KASAP Lack of reasonable suspicion