CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mars 2025
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-242636
- Date
- 4 mars 2025
- Publication
- 4 mars 2025
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 24 March 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 16592/22 Hikmet YILMAZ against Türkiye lodged on 18 March 2022 communicated on 4 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant due to the domestic courts’ failure to take evidence from a witness, F.S.A., in person before the trial court. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 of the Convention? Was the applicant able to examine the witness against him, as required by Article   6 §§   1 and 3 (d) of the Convention (see, for general principles, Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015, and Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey , no. 430/13, §§   44-76, 18   January 2022)?   The parties are invited to submit copies of all the relevant documents concerning the applicant’s case, including but not limited to the minutes of all the hearings, documentary evidence against the applicant, and the written submissions of the applicant and his lawyer throughout the proceedings. Additionally, the parties are also requested to submit the relevant documents forming part of the criminal proceedings in which the Elazığ 2nd Assize Court convicted the applicant of being a member of an armed terrorist organisation.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 4 mars 2025
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-242636
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel