CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 3 mars 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s11B18BC0 { margin-left:13.34pt; padding-left:4.66pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s57E44538 { margin-left:18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 24 March 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 29577/17 Yavuz Selim GÜLLÜCE and Esra GÜLLÜCE against Türkiye and 81 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 3 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications mainly concern the applicants’ arrest and pre-trial detention, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “ Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” ), in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état which took place on 15 July 2016. The applicants complain of a violation of Article   5 of the Convention on the basis of the following allegations (see the appended table for detailed information as to the specific complaints raised by each applicant): - They were detained in the absence of any suspicion that they committed an offence; - There were no relevant and sufficient reasons to justify their initial and/or continued pre-trial detention; - The length of their pre-trial detention was excessive; - The reviews of detention took place without a hearing and they were not notified of the opinion of the public prosecutor on those reviews; - Their access to the investigation files was restricted; - The objections to their detention or their requests for release were not examined or examined belatedly; - The decisions extending their pre-trial detention were not notified to them, or were notified with a delay, which prevented them from objecting against those decisions; - They did not benefit from effective legal assistance and facilities to challenge their detention, having particular regard to the fact that their communication with their lawyers was monitored by the prison authorities; - The time taken by the Constitutional Court to conduct its examination of their individual applications was excessive; - There was no remedy available to them to obtain compensation. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES On the basis of the complaints communicated in accordance with the list in the Appendix   1.     Can the applicants be considered to have been detained on the basis of “a reasonable suspicion” that they had committed an offence, for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention (see, in particular, Fox, Campbell and   Hartley v. the United Kingdom , 30   August 1990, § 32, Series A No. 182), taking into account, in particular, Article   100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires “concrete evidence demonstrating the existence of strong suspicions” as to the commission of the offence? Moreover, has the Constitutional Court based the existence of reasonable suspicion on evidence discovered after the decisions had been taken to detain the applicants (see, in particular, Baş v. Turkey , no. 66448/17, § 185, 3   March 2020)?   2.     Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article   5   §   3 of the Convention? In particular: (i)     Did the judges, who ordered the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention and the prolongation of their detention, and who examined the objections lodged against those decisions, fulfil their obligation to provide relevant and sufficient grounds for the deprivation of liberty in question (see, in particular, Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no.   23755/07, §   102, 5 July 2016)? (ii)     Was the length of the applicants’ pre-trial detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?   3.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective remedy by which they could challenge the lawfulness of their deprivation of liberty, as required by Article   5 §   4 of the Convention? In particular, the Government are invited to respond to the following complaints made by the applicants: (i)     the principle of equality of arms had not been respected, as the decisions to extend their detention and their objections to those decisions had been examined without a hearing and the prosecutors’ opinions had not been communicated to them (see, in particular, Baş , cited above, §§ 212-214, and Kocamış and Kurt v. Turkey , no.   227/13, §§ 34-35, 25 January 2022); (ii)     they had been unable to challenge their detention in an effective manner because of the restriction imposed on their access to the investigation file (see, inter alia , Ceviz v. Turkey , no. 8140/08, § 41, 17 July 2012); (iii)   their objections to their detention had not been examined or had been examined belatedly (see, for example, Shannon v. Latvia , no.   32214/03, §§   67-74, 24 November 2009); (iv)     the decisions to extend their detention had not been notified to them or had been notified with a delay, which had prevented them from lodging objections against those decisions (compare, for example, Voskuil v.   the   Netherlands , no. 64752/01, § 83, 22 November 2007); (v)     they had not had effective legal assistance or facilities to challenge their detention, having particular regard to the fact that their communication with their lawyers had been monitored (see, mutatis mutandis , Černák v. Slovakia , no.   36997/08, § 78, 17 December 2013); (vi)     the time taken by the Constitutional Court to examine their individual applications had been excessive (compare for the relevant principles Kavala v.   Turkey , no. 28749/18, §§ 181-184, 10 December 2019).   4.     Did the compensation remedy provided under Article   141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure constitute an effective remedy, within the meaning of Article   5 §   4 of the Convention, in respect of any of the applicants’ complaints?   5.     Did the applicants have, as required by Article 5 § 5 of the Convention, an effective and enforceable right in court to obtain compensation for their detention, which they consider to have been contrary to Article 5   §§   1, 3 and   4 (see Kocamış and Kurt , cited above, §§ 36-40)?       APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by Complaints   29577/17 Güllüce v. Türkiye 14/04/2017 Yavuz Selim GÜLLÜCE 2010 Istanbul Turkish Esra GÜLLÜCE 1984 Istanbul Turkish   Recep SEYHAN Length of pre-trial detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   72005/17 Ocak v. Türkiye 24/04/2017 Sıddık OCAK 1960 Kocaeli Turkish     Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during detention review Failure/delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   8391/18 Orhan v. Türkiye 23/01/2018 Mahmut ORHAN 1968 Malatya Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   15848/18 Çelik v. Bulgaria and Türkiye 28/03/2018 Bekir ÇELİK 1986 Istanbul Turkish Hasan ÇELİK 1993 Istanbul Turkish Hüseyin ÇELİK 1993 Istanbul Turkish Dilara YILMAZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   52589/18 Kurt v. Türkiye 31/10/2018 Ömer KURT 1980 Istanbul Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   53048/18 Şimşek v. Türkiye 24/10/2018 Mehmet ŞİMŞEK 1972 Erzincan Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   25256/19 Toker v. Türkiye 15/04/2019 Yetkin TOKER 1978 Antalya Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   25612/19 Özköse v. Türkiye 29/04/2019 Mehmet ÖZKÖSE 1977 Istanbul Turkish Sanem ÖZKÖSE Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   26376/19 Bulut v. Türkiye 14/05/2019 Numan BULUT 1974 Istanbul Turkish Zemzem Halime YILMAZ Lack of reasonable suspicion   40842/19 Duman v. Türkiye 23/07/2019 Ramazan DUMAN 1990 Samsun Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file   300/20 Demirkan v. Türkiye 12/12/2019 Doğan DEMİRKAN 1972 Çorum Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion     4125/20 Cengiz v. Türkiye 02/12/2019 Ahmet CENGİZ 1964 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   17848/20 Sayğılı v. Türkiye 21/04/2020 Salih SAYĞILI 1984 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   40948/20 Yıldız v. Türkiye 17/08/2020 Emrah YILDIZ 1985 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   43234/20 Büyükçakır v. Türkiye 25/08/2020 Mustafa BÜYÜKÇAKIR 1962 Balıkesir Turkish Fatih BÜYÜKÇAKIR Lack of reasonable suspicion   43510/20 Adsız v. Türkiye 04/09/2020 Osman ADSIZ 1989 Denizli Turkish Eslem Feyza YAPRAK Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   44391/20 Varol v. Türkiye 04/09/2020 İsmail VAROL 1995 Balıkesir Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   46526/20 Önemli v. Türkiye 16/10/2020 Arif ÖNEMLİ 1977 Istanbul Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   3580/21 Özçelik v. Türkiye 28/12/2020 İsmet ÖZÇELİK 1959 Denizli Turkish Ramazan MINGIR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   12296/21 Karaman v. Türkiye 17/02/2021 Özcan KARAMAN 1962 Aydın Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   15324/21 Cengiz v. Türkiye 16/03/2021 Yavuz CENGİZ 1987 Ankara Turkish Elif KANDİLLİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   15470/21 Kuzu v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 İlyas KUZU 1977 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   30336/21 Altun Giden v. Türkiye 21/05/2021 Derya ALTUN GİDEN 1983 Ordu Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   34053/21 Demirkıran v. Türkiye 18/06/2021 Temur DEMİRKIRAN 1981 Diyarbakır Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   41084/21 Sünel v. Türkiye 06/08/2021 Hüseyin SÜNEL 1975 Ankara Turkish   Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   44028/21 Genç v. Türkiye 19/08/2021 Osman Çelebi GENÇ 1987 Giresun Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   53721/21 Al v. Türkiye 22/10/2021 Yaşar AL 1980 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   58530/21 Dışbudak v. Türkiye 25/11/2021 Kadir DIŞBUDAK 1981 Ankara Turkish Nalan KELEBEK KURU Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   2855/22 Karaduman v. Türkiye 27/12/2021 Kadri KARADUMAN 1977 Diyarbakır Turkish Vedat KARADUMAN Lack of reasonable suspicion   11976/22 Özel v. Türkiye 24/02/2022 Recep ÖZEL 1990 Ankara Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   12271/22 Can v. Türkiye 02/03/2022 Ali İhsan CAN 1989 Istanbul Turkish Emre AKARYILDIZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/delay in examining requests for release/objection Failure/delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   12605/22 Solak v. Türkiye 04/03/2022 Mehmet Ali SOLAK Kayseri Turkish İlyas TEKİN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack/difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   15248/22 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 09/03/2022 Resul YILMAZ 1989 Ankara Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   15365/22 Filiz v. Türkiye 15/03/2022 Süleyman FİLİZ 1984 Çorum Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   16336/22 Baştuğ v. Türkiye 23/03/2022 Recep BAŞTUĞ 1992 Hakkari Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   16560/22 Yücel v. Türkiye 21/03/2022 Mahmut YÜCEL 1990 Manisa Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion   16795/22 Gündüz v. Türkiye 23/03/2022 Yusuf Kenan GÜNDÜZ 1984 Istanbul Turkish Elif GÜNDÜZ Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   17820/22 Küyük v. Türkiye 16/03/2022 Yakup KÜYÜK 1986 Kocaeli Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   17876/22 Alaç v. Türkiye 17/03/2022 Ali Erkan ALAÇ 1971 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   18512/22 Solak v. Türkiye 24/03/2022 Ömer SOLAK 1984 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Eyyüp SAĞIR Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   18699/22 Bayraktar v. Türkiye 01/04/2022 Ayhan BAYRAKTAR 1983 Ankara Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK Lack of reasonable suspicion   19156/22 Erdoğan v. Türkiye 06/04/2022 Davut ERDOĞAN 1969 Ankara Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   19438/22 Keleş v. Türkiye 08/04/2022 Olcay KELEŞ 1982 Karabük Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   19624/22 Çoşkun v. Türkiye 07/04/2022 Yusuf ÇOŞKUN 1977 Hatay Turkish Dudu ERTUNÇ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   20752/22 Atasoy v. Türkiye 13/04/2022 Mehmet Mutlu ATASOY 1989 İzmir Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   21290/22 Kırdagül v. Türkiye 22/04/2022 Ali KIRDAGÜL 1974 Ankara Turkish Uğur ALTUN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   21338/22 Şahin v. Türkiye 25/04/2022 Necdet ŞAHİN 1970 Ankara Turkish Zafer İRAZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of hearing during the detention review   21669/22 Hecipoğlu v. Türkiye 15/04/2022 Bedriye Nehir HECİPOĞLU 1988 İzmir Turkish Mehmet Fatih HECIPOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   22817/22 Toklucu v. Türkiye 28/04/2022 Oğuz Saltuk Buğra TOKLUCU 1991 İzmir Turkish Levent MAZILIGÜNEY Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   22958/22 Ağrıtmış v. Türkiye 26/04/2022 Emre Faik AĞRITMIŞ 1990 İzmir Turkish Kadriye Nur TÜMEN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   23659/22 Karakaş v. Türkiye 28/04/2022 Ahmet KARAKAŞ 1980 Sakarya Turkish Sefanur BOZGÖZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   24170/22 Erişen v. Türkiye 06/04/2022 Abdullah ERİŞEN 1979 Amasya Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   24407/22 Çınar v. Türkiye 26/04/2022 Ahmet ÇINAR 1985 Sincan Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   25051/22 Durukan v. Türkiye 29/04/2022 Necati DURUKAN 1990 Osmaniye Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   25414/22 Subaşı v. Türkiye 06/05/2022 Volkan SUBAŞI 1976 Ankara Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   25979/22 Kandemir v. Türkiye 20/05/2022 Ufuk KANDEMİR 1982 Istanbul Turkish Halil İbrahim ALBAY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   26221/22 Öney v. Türkiye 13/05/2022 İsa ÖNEY 1977 Konya Turkish Cihat ÇITIR Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   27531/22 Demirhas v. Türkiye 23/05/2022 Suat DEMİRHAS 1989 Istanbul Turkish Yadigar GÖNÜLLÜ Lack of reasonable suspicion   28609/22 Fındık v. Türkiye 18/05/2022 Hikmet Zehra FINDIK 1986 Istanbul Turkish Ruken MUSTAFAOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   30302/22 Arslantosun v. Türkiye 06/05/2022 Nazım ARSLANTOSUN 1986 Ankara Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHIN Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   30418/22 Yesirci v. Türkiye 18/05/2022 Emre YESİRCİ 1985 Ankara Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   31454/22 Taş v. Türkiye 02/06/2022 Hüseyin TAŞ 1991 Ankara Turkish Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   31507/22 Karadaş v. Türkiye 01/06/2022 Mesut KARADAŞ 1982 Erzurum Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   31897/22 Eroğlu v. Türkiye 18/05/2022 Fatih EROĞLU 1975 İzmit Turkish   Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Length of pre-trial detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   32528/22 Çapkan v. Türkiye 17/06/2022 Mehmet ÇAPKAN 1981 Istanbul Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review   33019/22 Karahan v. Türkiye 31/05/2022 Melih KARAHAN 1975 Düzce Turkish   Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Length of pre-trial detention   33125/22 Çeliksoy v. Türkiye 29/06/2022 Hasan ÇELİKSOY 1985 Aydın Turkish Uğur BAY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   33192/22 Altınkök v. Türkiye 28/06/2022 Serhat ALTINKÖK 1978 Bursa Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   33226/22 Zeybek v. Türkiye 01/07/2022 Mustafa ZEYBEK 1979 Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   33527/22 Bayındır v. Türkiye 20/06/2022 Abdullah BAYINDIR 1977 Bingöl Turkish Sümeyra BAYINDIR Lack of reasonable suspicion   33656/22 Güven v. Türkiye 14/06/2022 Ramazan GÜVEN 1967 Balıkesir Turkish Mustafa YELBEY Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   34908/22 Güzel v. Türkiye 16/06/2022 Mehmet GÜZEL 1975 Erzurum Turkish   Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   35155/22 Gömleksiz v. Türkiye 09/06/2022 Zafer GÖMLEKSİZ 1976 Samsun Turkish Tahir EREN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   35593/22 Erden v. Türkiye 29/06/2022 Erhan ERDEN 1991 Bursa Turkish Dilek İLHAN DALKIRAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   35611/22 Daştan v. Türkiye 07/06/2022 Zafer DAŞTAN 1980 Erzincan Turkish Fatma DAŞTAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review   36323/22 Bozer v. Türkiye 09/06/2022 Ömer BOZER 1988 Istanbul Turkish Yadigar GÖNÜLLÜ Lack of reasonable suspicion   36378/22 Güner v. Türkiye 07/07/2022 Yunus Emre GÜNER 1988 Istanbul Turkish   Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   37348/22 Ballı v. Türkiye 01/06/2022 Ahmet BALLI 1982 Tokat Turkish Üsame İNAN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion   37630/22 Koç v. Türkiye 14/07/2022 Eren KOÇ 1986 Kütahya Turkish Ulvi KARAŞAHİN Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention   37890/22 Arıcan v. Türkiye 01/07/2022 Mesut Fetullah ARICAN 1992 Konya Turkish Muhammet Emin ÇITIR Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file   37918/22 Bolat v. Türkiye 05/07/2022 İbrahim Mete BOLAT 1991 Samsun Turkish İnan UZUN Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection   38851/22 Akaydın v. Türkiye 08/07/2022 Ali Osman AKAYDIN 1975 Samsun Turkish Zeliha DERVİŞOĞLU Lack of reasonable suspicion