CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 mai 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Published on 10 June 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 9195/23 Lukas SVIRPLYS and Raimedas LATVYS against Lithuania lodged on 15 February 2023   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Subject matter of the case and Questions to the parties , which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Can the applicants still claim to be “victims”, within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, of a violation of their rights under Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, following the decision of the Vilnius District Court of 15   April 2025 by which the perpetrator was convicted of the criminal offence of discrimination and the applicants were awarded compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage?