CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 23 juillet 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s65E06E64 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s96D82958 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s57B8E6C { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .sB71C1C6 { width:7.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sECD46F1B { width:40.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s582B6897 { width:28.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE5627FA5 { width:22.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s274C830C { width:7.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBF0C475 { width:40.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAD05385B { width:28.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9B7A7BB6 { width:22.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 11 August 2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 32156/20 Artem Volodymyrovych LAVRINENKO and Others against Ukraine lodged on 16 July 2020 and 20 May 2025 communicated on 27 September 2024 and 23 July 2025 ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES IN RESPECT OF THE THIRD APPLICANT 1.     Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see paragraph 104 of Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention? 2.     Has the State complied with its positive obligation under Article 2 to put in place an effective regulatory framework in the field of health care that would ensure proper protection of the life of the third applicant’s sister (see Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, §§   186-89, 19   December 2017)? 3.     Was the third applicant’s sister subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in view of the alleged inadequate medical care provided to her in the public hospital? If so, did the State comply with its positive obligation under Article 3 of the Convention to protect the third applicant’s sister from ill-treatment? 4.     Having regard to the State’s procedural obligation envisaged in Article   3 of the Convention, has the investigation into the above allegations of medical malpractice been effective? APPENDIX No. Applicant’s Name Date of birth Place of residence Nationality   1. Artem Volodymyrovych LAVRINENKO (“the first applicant”) 31/07/1976 Bobrynets Ukrainian 2. Nataliya Anatoliyivna LAVRINENKO (“the second applicant”) 25/05/1980 Bobrynets   Ukrainian 3. Andriy Artemovych LAVRINENKO (“the third applicant”) 23/12/2002 Bobrynets Ukrainian