CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 août 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .sFF075836 { margin-right:7.05pt; margin-left:7.05pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s91F6AE57 { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold } Published on 25 August 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 21800/19 Heves SAKI and Others against Türkiye and 4 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 4 August 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the de facto expropriation of plots of land partially owned by the applicants and the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. The applicants complain that their property was expropriated without following the legal procedure provided for by law, in breach of Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention. The applicants also complain under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, on account of the de facto expropriation of their land ( Sarıca and   Dilaver v. Turkey , no. 11765/05, §§ 38-52, 27 May 2010)?   2.     Was the length of the proceedings before the Turkish Constitutional Court in the present cases in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention ( Project-Trade d.o.o. v. Croatia , no.   1920/14, §§   99 ‑ 104, 19 November 2020)?     APPENDIX No. Application No. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 21800/19 Saki and Others v. Türkiye 11/04/2019 Heves SAKİ 1971 Ankara Turkish Şeyda DEMİRTAŞ 1968 Ankara Turkish Muharrem GÜLER 1973 Ankara Turkish Ahmet METİN 1969 Çankırı Turkish Turay ÖZBEY 1949 Ankara Turkish Ayla SARITAŞ 1965 Ankara Turkish   Enver SARITAŞ 1940 Ankara Turkish   Gökhan SARITAŞ 1985 Ankara Turkish   Hüseyin SARITAŞ 1971 Ankara Turkish   Hakan AKARKEN 2. 21931/19 Toraman v. Türkiye 11/04/2019 Zafer TORAMAN 1964 Ankara Turkish Cevriye TORAMAN 1944 Ankara Turkish   Hakan AKARKEN 3. 21966/19 Toraman and Others v. Türkiye 11/04/2019 Muhammet TORAMAN 1961 Ankara Turkish Zümrüye TUNÇYÜREK 1971 Ankara Turkish   İzzet TURGUT 1956 Ankara Turkish   Ali ULUS 1944 Ankara Turkish   Hakan AKARKEN 4. 21979/19 Özkan and Others v. Türkiye 11/04/2019 Zeki ÖZKAN 1960 Ankara Turkish     Münevver DEVRAN 1971 Ankara Turkish Kamil PERÇİN 1963 Ankara Turkish Makbule PERÇİN 1940 Ankara Turkish Muharrem PERÇİN 1965 Ankara Turkish Esma ŞAHİN 1968 Ankara Turkish   Asiye SALAP 1964 Ankara Turkish Ayşe SEVGİLİ 1955 Ankara Turkish Selma TEKİN 1952 Ankara Turkish       Hakan AKARKEN 5. 22467/19 Türkmen and Uslu v. Türkiye 16/04/2019 Şaban TÜRKMEN 1947 İzmir Turkish Dursun USLU 1940 Ankara Turkish   Hakan AKARKEN