CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 17 septembre 2025

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10027FC0 { margin-left:5.4pt; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s3590B0A7 { height:17.35pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD81AB0A7 { height:11.35pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9D083258 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:56.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-21.25pt } .sF480646D { width:17.92pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)267 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty-two cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 September 2025 at the 1537 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 41216/13 PETUKHOV (No. 2) 12/03/2019 09/09/2019 84210/17+ LOPATA AND OTHERS 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 61839/12 STARISHKO 15/10/2020 15/10/2020 2778/18+ DEMBO AND OTHERS 11/03/2021 11/03/2021 63747/14+ FARZIYEV AND OTHERS 01/04/2021 01/04/2021 23047/20 RUSANDU 01/04/2021 01/04/2021 15027/20+ BARANOV AND OTHERS 20/05/2021 20/05/2021 19102/20+ BORISENKO AND OTHERS 15/04/2021 15/04/2021 46896/18+ CHISTYAKOVAND OTHERS 10/06/2021 10/06/2021 21845/20+ MANOYLOV AND OTHERS 10/06/2021 10/06/2021 11551/13 POLTORATSKYY 22/04/2021 22/04/2021 22851/20 PYATACHENKO AND OTHERS 15/04/2021 15/04/2021 7925/20+ KOCHURA AND OTHERS 16/09/2021 16/09/2021 53152/16+ KRUPKO AND OTHERS 22/07/2021 22/07/2021 33994/20+ LEBEDYEV AND OTHERS 22/07/2021 22/07/2021 27870/18+ RODZEVILLO AND OTHERS 28/10/2021 28/10/2021 1691/21+ SYOMAK AND OTHERS 02/12/2021 02/12/2021 22356/20+ TOKAR AND OTHERS 18/11/2021 18/11/2021 432/20+ SELESH AND OTHERS 10/02/2022 10/02/2022 19957/21+ BOLDYREV AND OTHERS 06/10/2022 06/10/2022 52784/19 ZAKHAROV 10/11/2022 10/11/2022 5084/18 KUPINSKYY 10/11/2022 10/02/2023   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -             of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -             of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments, including the putting into place of a Convention-compliant mechanism of review of life sentences and the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2025)827 );   Noting further that the outstanding individual and general measures relating to the issue of communication between life prisoners will continue to be examined by the Committee in the Ivan Karpenko case , as a part of the Sukachov case and Nevmerzhitsky/Yakovenko/Melnik groups of cases; and the general measures in relation to the adequacy of medical care continue to be examined in the framework of the Logvinenko/ Isayev/Kats and Others groups of cases , and that the closure of these cases in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to the aforementioned issue;   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.