CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 septembre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s8D33CCA4 { width:7.76%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s8FC5BBC9 { width:26.9%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s54BE60A4 { width:25.08%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s34DC645D { width:21.22%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s3E5849E9 { width:19.04%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC18851D5 { width:7.76%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5A264551 { width:26.9%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCAD3A559 { width:25.08%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s43AC8D76 { width:21.22%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s68C24B4D { width:19.04%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 6 October 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 8159/22 Şenel ÇELİK and Others against Türkiye lodged on 28 January 2022 communicated on 19 September 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the depreciation of the compensation awarded to the applicants by the civil courts, in the period from the date of the final judgment of the Court of Cassation to the date of payment, for the loss of their two separate plots of land following the cadastral survey. The applicants complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that they suffered a financial loss as the compensation awarded was depreciated due to the monetary inflation during the relevant period. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1? In particular, as regards the period from the date of the final domestic court decision of the Court of Cassation until the date of payment, did the loss of value, which was suffered by the applicants as a result of the difference between the inflation rate and the interest rate applied to the compensation award, impose an excessive and disproportionate burden on them ( see, mutatis mutandis , Akkuş v. Turkey , 9 July 1997, §§   20-21 and   29 ‑ 31, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, and Aka v.   Turkey , 23   September 1998, §§ 42-51, Reports   1998 ‑ VI )?   APPENDIX No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality Place of residence 1. Şenel ÇELİK   1956 Turkish Ankara 2. Filiz AYGÜN   1975 Turkish Ankara 3. Güven ÇELİK   1975 Turkish Ankara 4. Mehmet ÇELİK   1976 Turkish Samsun