CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 8 décembre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 5 January 2026   SECOND SECTION Application no. 39437/23 László TÓTH against Hungary lodged on 26 October 2023 communicated on 8 December 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the complete removal, by operation of the law and as of 25 January 2015, of the applicant’s service pension, the right to which he had previously acquired on the strength of his service time at the police and of an accident suffered in service. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 (see   Béláné Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080/13, §§ 72-89 and §§ 112-18, 13   December 2016; Lengyel v. Hungary , no. 8271/15, 18 July 2017; Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117/13, §§ 60-85, 5 September 2017; Kovács v.   Hungary [Committee], no. 25294/15, 7 October 2021)?