CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 29 septembre 1982
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49244
- Date
- 29 septembre 1982
- Publication
- 29 septembre 1982
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleNo violation
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged by Mr Guy Jespers against Belgium (No. 8403/78);   Whereas on 4 March 1982 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights, in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;   Whereas in this application, introduced on 23 October 1978, the applicant presented a certain number of complaints concerning the proceedings as a result of which he had been convicted, invoking Article 5, paragraph 1 (art. 5-1), Article 6, paragraphs 1, 2, 3.b and d (art. 6-1, art. 6-2, art. 6-3-b, art. 6-3-d), as well as Articles 14 and 13 (art. 13, art. 14) of the Convention;   Whereas the Commission, after declaring the application partly admissible on 15 October 1980, expressed in its report, by 9 votes and 3 abstentions, the opinion that Article 6, paragraph 3.b (art. 6-3-b), of the Convention had not ben violated and also that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), had not been violated;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention;   Voting in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention,   Decides that, in this case, there was no violation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 29 septembre 1982
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49244
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral