CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 30 mai 1986
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49259
- Date
- 30 mai 1986
- Publication
- 30 mai 1986
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleNo violation
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights relating to the application lodged by Mr Pierre Pannetier against Switzerland (Application No. 9299/81);   Whereas on 17 September 1985 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights, in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in his application introduced on 13 February 1981 the applicant complains mainly of the length of criminal proceedings lodged against him by the Swiss judicial authorities, alleging a violation of Article 6, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3.d (art. 6-1, art. 6-2, art. 6-3-d) of the convention;   Whereas the Commission after having declared the application admissible on 13 March 1984, in its report, after having considered that the Swiss authorities had implicitly acknowledged and in substance afforded redress for any damage suffered by the applicant owing to the length of the proceedings, and that it was not therefore required to decide whether there had been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1) of the convention in this case, concluded, by eleven votes with two abstentions, that the applicant could not claim to be the victim, within the meaning of Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention, of a violation by Switzerland of the rights enshrined in Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1);   Having regard to the opinion formulated by the Commission,   Decides that in this case the applicant cannot claim, under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention, to be a victim of a violation by Switzerland of the rights set forth in Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), and that in these conditions no further action is called for on the part of the Committee of Ministers in this matter.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 30 mai 1986
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49259
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral