CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17Satisfaction
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 2 mars 1989
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49279
- Date
- 2 mars 1989
- Publication
- 2 mars 1989
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Just satisfaction recommended
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the application lodged on 1 December 1981 by Mr Pasquale Minniti against Italy (No. 9630/81);   Whereas on 18 November 1987 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in his application the applicant complained inter alia of the length of civil proceedings brought by him with a view to obtaining an invalidity pension, alleging a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 13 October 1986 as regards the issue of the length of proceedings and in its report adopted on 15 October 1987 expressed unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention in this case;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;   Having examined the proposals made by the Commission concerning just satisfaction for the applicant,   Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention, that there has been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention in this case;   Recommends, under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the convention, that the Government of Italy pay to the applicant the sum of three million Italian lire in respect of non-material damage and costs;   Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in this case.    Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Dispositif
- Satisfaction
- Date
- 2 mars 1989
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49279